Homeownership isn’t for everyone. Roughly 44 million American households have opted to rent rather than buy their homes because of convenience, cost or both. But renting isn’t always a cheaper or better alternative to owning a property. The right road to take depends on a variety of factors, including an individual’s or family’s financial means and how well the local real-estate market is doing.
As vaccination against COVID-19 has allowed states to reopen, rental prices have risen significantly. During 2021, they grew at almost double the rate of any previous year. Meanwhile, mortgage rates are also rising at the fastest rate in over a decade. Like home prices, however, rental rates can vary significantly by region, state or city. And in some places, renting will prove to be more cost-effective and a better overall value than owning.
To determine where renters can get the most bang for their buck, WalletHub compared more than 180 rental markets based on 22 key measures of rental attractiveness and quality of life. Our data set ranges from the difference between rental rates and mortgage payments to historical price changes, the cost of living and job availability.
Main Findings
Best Places to Rent
Overall Rank | City | Total Score | Rental Market & Affordability | Quality of Life |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Columbia, MD | 60.04 | 11 | 5 |
2 | Overland Park, KS | 59.58 | 9 | 12 |
3 | Sioux Falls, SD | 57.02 | 3 | 110 |
4 | Bismarck, ND | 56.31 | 1 | 152 |
5 | Lincoln, NE | 55.90 | 10 | 47 |
6 | Chandler, AZ | 55.80 | 31 | 16 |
7 | Scottsdale, AZ | 55.75 | 45 | 3 |
8 | Gilbert, AZ | 55.54 | 28 | 20 |
9 | El Paso, TX | 55.24 | 42 | 9 |
10 | Casper, WY | 54.84 | 2 | 150 |
11 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 54.56 | 6 | 86 |
12 | Fargo, ND | 54.55 | 4 | 134 |
13 | Cheyenne, WY | 54.36 | 5 | 133 |
14 | San Francisco, CA | 54.05 | 50 | 9 |
15 | South Burlington, VT | 53.41 | 29 | 34 |
16 | Juneau, AK | 53.15 | 14 | 79 |
17 | Plano, TX | 53.01 | 53 | 15 |
18 | Raleigh, NC | 52.98 | 20 | 58 |
19 | Peoria, AZ | 52.75 | 32 | 35 |
20 | San Jose, CA | 52.65 | 87 | 4 |
21 | Laredo, TX | 52.35 | 77 | 8 |
22 | Fremont, CA | 52.27 | 86 | 7 |
23 | Omaha, NE | 52.08 | 16 | 80 |
24 | Madison, WI | 50.86 | 44 | 49 |
25 | Irvine, CA | 50.24 | 130 | 6 |
26 | Brownsville, TX | 49.98 | 58 | 32 |
27 | Austin, TX | 49.78 | 78 | 29 |
28 | Portland, ME | 49.69 | 137 | 1 |
29 | Tucson, AZ | 49.64 | 64 | 36 |
30 | Glendale, AZ | 49.55 | 67 | 38 |
31 | Durham, NC | 49.37 | 21 | 99 |
32 | Chesapeake, VA | 49.20 | 18 | 109 |
33 | Henderson, NV | 49.04 | 65 | 46 |
34 | Des Moines, IA | 49.03 | 22 | 106 |
35 | Lewiston, ME | 48.98 | 70 | 37 |
36 | Grand Prairie, TX | 48.95 | 73 | 33 |
37 | Virginia Beach, VA | 48.92 | 43 | 70 |
38 | Yonkers, NY | 48.91 | 82 | 30 |
39 | Mesa, AZ | 48.87 | 66 | 45 |
40 | Nashua, NH | 48.61 | 106 | 23 |
41 | Las Cruces, NM | 48.44 | 34 | 91 |
42 | Huntsville, AL | 47.99 | 25 | 116 |
43 | Boise, ID | 47.85 | 121 | 28 |
44 | Rapid City, SD | 47.65 | 13 | 156 |
45 | Charleston, WV | 47.34 | 24 | 125 |
46 | Amarillo, TX | 46.85 | 23 | 147 |
47 | Phoenix, AZ | 46.84 | 76 | 59 |
48 | Seattle, WA | 46.81 | 75 | 60 |
49 | Tampa, FL | 46.64 | 141 | 17 |
50 | Warwick, RI | 46.50 | 135 | 25 |
51 | Charlotte, NC | 46.41 | 35 | 115 |
52 | Orlando, FL | 46.39 | 143 | 21 |
53 | Fort Worth, TX | 46.32 | 54 | 82 |
54 | Irving, TX | 46.24 | 62 | 77 |
55 | Newport News, VA | 46.06 | 33 | 128 |
56 | West Valley City, UT | 46.03 | 84 | 65 |
57 | Norfolk, VA | 46.00 | 51 | 89 |
58 | Albuquerque, NM | 45.89 | 39 | 114 |
59 | Winston-Salem, NC | 45.85 | 30 | 140 |
60 | Huntington Beach, CA | 45.82 | 151 | 14 |
61 | Oklahoma City, OK | 45.67 | 37 | 120 |
62 | San Diego, CA | 45.65 | 171 | 2 |
63 | Washington, DC | 45.62 | 69 | 81 |
64 | Tempe, AZ | 45.60 | 79 | 74 |
65 | Kansas City, MO | 45.55 | 26 | 143 |
66 | Arlington, TX | 45.43 | 83 | 75 |
67 | Anchorage, AK | 45.40 | 12 | 168 |
68 | Santa Clarita, CA | 45.29 | 146 | 19 |
69 | Wichita, KS | 45.27 | 7 | 175 |
70 | Billings, MT | 45.21 | 15 | 174 |
71 | Santa Rosa, CA | 45.15 | 150 | 18 |
72 | Mobile, AL | 45.14 | 19 | 164 |
73 | Bakersfield, CA | 45.11 | 48 | 102 |
74 | Little Rock, AR | 44.99 | 17 | 173 |
75 | Aurora, IL | 44.94 | 97 | 67 |
76 | Rochester, NY | 44.91 | 61 | 97 |
77 | Pittsburgh, PA | 44.90 | 100 | 69 |
78 | Denver, CO | 44.88 | 81 | 83 |
79 | Miami, FL | 44.77 | 167 | 11 |
80 | San Antonio, TX | 44.74 | 112 | 61 |
81 | Las Vegas, NV | 44.55 | 115 | 62 |
82 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 44.55 | 46 | 119 |
83 | Burlington, VT | 44.44 | 63 | 101 |
84 | Reno, NV | 44.36 | 131 | 54 |
85 | St. Petersburg, FL | 44.26 | 138 | 44 |
86 | Fort Smith, AR | 44.01 | 8 | 177 |
87 | Charleston, SC | 43.88 | 119 | 64 |
88 | Garland, TX | 43.72 | 128 | 63 |
89 | Manchester, NH | 43.67 | 114 | 73 |
90 | Honolulu, HI | 43.64 | 136 | 55 |
91 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 43.62 | 168 | 13 |
92 | Jacksonville, FL | 43.60 | 134 | 56 |
93 | Columbia, SC | 43.54 | 57 | 117 |
94 | Jersey City, NJ | 43.31 | 93 | 90 |
95 | Grand Rapids, MI | 43.30 | 55 | 121 |
96 | Dallas, TX | 43.08 | 94 | 92 |
97 | Columbus, OH | 42.97 | 71 | 113 |
98 | Salt Lake City, UT | 42.80 | 85 | 105 |
99 | Minneapolis, MN | 42.70 | 88 | 103 |
100 | St. Louis, MO | 42.53 | 41 | 153 |
101 | Sacramento, CA | 42.43 | 164 | 31 |
102 | Indianapolis, IN | 42.42 | 36 | 160 |
103 | Anaheim, CA | 42.38 | 161 | 39 |
104 | Dover, DE | 42.32 | 40 | 162 |
105 | Greensboro, NC | 42.31 | 52 | 144 |
106 | Tulsa, OK | 42.31 | 56 | 136 |
107 | Buffalo, NY | 42.26 | 68 | 129 |
108 | Atlanta, GA | 42.19 | 125 | 85 |
109 | Chicago, IL | 42.16 | 110 | 94 |
110 | Glendale, CA | 41.90 | 172 | 22 |
111 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 41.84 | 158 | 41 |
112 | Chula Vista, CA | 41.83 | 163 | 40 |
113 | Fresno, CA | 41.61 | 123 | 93 |
114 | Fort Wayne, IN | 41.51 | 60 | 148 |
115 | Cincinnati, OH | 41.51 | 120 | 98 |
116 | Birmingham, AL | 41.43 | 38 | 165 |
117 | Missoula, MT | 41.42 | 72 | 137 |
118 | Colorado Springs, CO | 41.42 | 109 | 104 |
119 | Cape Coral, FL | 41.39 | 157 | 48 |
120 | Spokane, WA | 41.37 | 105 | 111 |
121 | Long Beach, CA | 41.20 | 162 | 52 |
122 | Garden Grove, CA | 41.16 | 173 | 26 |
123 | Fayetteville, NC | 41.06 | 49 | 161 |
124 | Los Angeles, CA | 40.82 | 166 | 51 |
125 | Salem, OR | 40.71 | 99 | 123 |
126 | Portland, OR | 40.71 | 144 | 76 |
127 | Corpus Christi, TX | 40.52 | 96 | 130 |
128 | Baltimore, MD | 40.45 | 47 | 163 |
129 | Bridgeport, CT | 40.37 | 165 | 43 |
130 | New York, NY | 40.37 | 174 | 42 |
131 | Hialeah, FL | 40.34 | 181 | 24 |
132 | Fontana, CA | 40.32 | 147 | 72 |
133 | Louisville, KY | 40.29 | 74 | 149 |
134 | Knoxville, TN | 40.21 | 98 | 135 |
135 | Nashville, TN | 40.17 | 89 | 141 |
136 | Oakland, CA | 40.13 | 129 | 107 |
137 | North Las Vegas, NV | 40.13 | 113 | 118 |
138 | Pearl City, HI | 39.78 | 153 | 68 |
139 | St. Paul, MN | 39.77 | 111 | 126 |
140 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 39.67 | 159 | 66 |
141 | New Haven, CT | 39.61 | 156 | 71 |
142 | Boston, MA | 39.53 | 148 | 87 |
143 | Worcester, MA | 39.40 | 139 | 100 |
144 | Springfield, MO | 39.37 | 27 | 181 |
145 | Providence, RI | 39.31 | 149 | 84 |
146 | Aurora, CO | 39.29 | 108 | 138 |
147 | Santa Ana, CA | 39.15 | 177 | 53 |
148 | Montgomery, AL | 39.08 | 59 | 170 |
149 | Tacoma, WA | 38.95 | 126 | 131 |
150 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 38.92 | 178 | 50 |
151 | Houston, TX | 38.79 | 127 | 132 |
152 | Newark, NJ | 38.74 | 117 | 142 |
153 | Oxnard, CA | 38.70 | 170 | 57 |
154 | Riverside, CA | 38.57 | 155 | 88 |
155 | Gulfport, MS | 38.50 | 90 | 158 |
156 | Stockton, CA | 38.47 | 132 | 124 |
157 | Milwaukee, WI | 38.37 | 102 | 151 |
158 | Richmond, VA | 38.34 | 80 | 167 |
159 | Oceanside, CA | 38.07 | 182 | 27 |
160 | Lubbock, TX | 38.01 | 101 | 155 |
161 | Huntington, WV | 37.80 | 103 | 159 |
162 | Toledo, OH | 37.77 | 107 | 154 |
163 | Modesto, CA | 37.65 | 145 | 112 |
164 | Wilmington, DE | 37.53 | 133 | 139 |
165 | Philadelphia, PA | 37.53 | 140 | 127 |
166 | Tallahassee, FL | 37.47 | 152 | 108 |
167 | Akron, OH | 37.21 | 116 | 157 |
168 | Nampa, ID | 37.18 | 142 | 122 |
169 | Chattanooga, TN | 36.96 | 91 | 172 |
170 | Baton Rouge, LA | 35.43 | 118 | 169 |
171 | Jackson, MS | 35.26 | 124 | 171 |
172 | Moreno Valley, CA | 35.24 | 175 | 95 |
173 | Augusta, GA | 35.22 | 95 | 179 |
174 | Ontario, CA | 34.98 | 180 | 78 |
175 | Vancouver, WA | 34.80 | 179 | 96 |
176 | Shreveport, LA | 34.32 | 92 | 180 |
177 | Columbus, GA | 33.67 | 122 | 176 |
178 | New Orleans, LA | 33.16 | 169 | 145 |
179 | Cleveland, OH | 32.45 | 154 | 166 |
180 | San Bernardino, CA | 32.29 | 176 | 146 |
181 | Memphis, TN | 31.70 | 104 | 182 |
182 | Detroit, MI | 27.95 | 160 | 178 |
Note: With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.

- Most
- 1. Cheyenne, WY
- 2. Bismarck, ND
- 3. Cedar Rapids, IA
- 4. Sioux Falls, SD
- 5. Overland Park, KS

- Least
- T-178. Detroit, MI
- T-178. New Haven, CT
- T-178. Miami, FL
- T-178. Newark, NJ
- T-178. Hialeah, FL

- Highest
- 1. Little Rock, AR
- 2. Casper, WY
- 3. Augusta, GA
- 4. Amarillo, TX
- 5. Charleston, WV

- Lowest
- T-178. Warwick, RI
- T-178. Santa Ana, CA
- 180. Hialeah, FL
- T-181. Nashua, NH
- T-181. South Burlington, VT

- Lowest
- 1. Cheyenne, WY
- 2. Casper, WY
- 3. Bakersfield, CA
- 4. San Jose, CA
- 5. Fremont, CA

- Highest
- 176. Birmingham, AL
- 177. Huntington, WV
- T-178. Detroit, MI
- T-178. Cleveland, OH
- T-178. Rochester, NY

- Lowest
- 1. Brownsville, TX
- 2. Jackson, MS
- 3. Laredo, TX
- 4. Amarillo, TX
- 5. Fort Smith, AR

- Highest
- T-165. San Jose, CA
- T-165. Pearl City, HI
- T-165. Honolulu, HI
- T-165. San Francisco, CA
- T-165. New York, NY

- Most
- 1. Port St. Lucie, FL
- 2. Nashua, NH
- 3. Santa Clarita, CA
- 4. Gilbert, AZ
- 5. Warwick, RI

- Least
- 174. Chattanooga, TN
- 175. Memphis, TN
- 176. St. Louis, MO
- T-177. Birmingham, AL
- T-177. Springfield, MO
Ask the Experts
Finding a suitable rental unit is a similar process to buying a home. Your search may be based purely on cost or also on needs, such as the number of bedrooms or close proximity to work. For guidance, we asked a panel of experts to share their thoughts on the following key questions:
- What tips do you have for a person looking to get the best value in an apartment?
- What are the most common mistakes that renters make when searching for a new apartment?
- In evaluating the best and worst cities for renters, what are the top five indicators?
- Are the fastest growing cities a good place for renters? Why?
- How can local policymakers make housing more affordable for renters without upsetting homeowners?
Ask the Experts
Ph.D. – Professor, Department of Finance and Law, College of Business & Economics – California State University, Los Angeles
Read More
Professor of Finance and Ivory-Boyer Chair in Real Estate, David Eccles School of Business – University of Utah
Read More
Founder & Principal, petersgroup consulting; Design principal, peters studio design/build and Graduate Professor of Real Estate Development and Finance, and Urbanism – George Washington University
Read More
Assistant Professor of the Practice, Urban Economics and Public Sector Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences – Villanova University
Read More
Finance Ph.D. Candidate, Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis
Read More
Senior Fellow - Brookings Metro, Future of the Middle Class Initiative – The Brookings Institution
Read More
Methodology
In order to determine the best local rental markets, WalletHub compared 182 cities — including the 150 most populated U.S. cities, plus at least two of the most populated cities in each state — across two key dimensions, “Rental Market & Affordability” and “Quality of Life.”
We evaluated those dimensions using 22 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for renters. Data for metrics marked with an asterisk (*) were available at the state level only.
Finally, we determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order our sample. Our sample considers only the city proper in each case and excludes cities in the surrounding metro area.
Rental Market & Affordability – Total Points: 60
- Share of Renters: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: This metric specifically measures the share of renter occupied housing units among total occupied housing units. - Rental Vacancy Rate: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
- Sublet Laws-Friendliness*: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
- Average Home Square Footage: Half Weight (~1.62 Points)
- Share of Newer Homes: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: “Newer Homes” include housing units built between 2010 and 2020. - Rental Affordability: Triple Weight (~9.73 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated as follows: Median Gross Rent / Median Annual Household Income. - Share of Apartment Community Pillar Listings: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: A Community Pillar landlord has agreed to relax their standard tenant screening process in order to help applicants with potential rental barriers—such as low incomes, spotty credit scores, unemployment, or lack of housing references—be able to obtain housing. - Historical Rental-Price Changes: Triple Weight (~9.73 Points)
Note: This metric specifically measures the year-over-year change in rent prices (2022 vs. 2021 vs. 2020). - Share of Severely Cost-Burdened Renter Households: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: “Severely Cost-Burdened Renter Households,” as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, refers to consumers who spend at least 50 percent of their income on housing. - Average Annual Renters-Insurance Premium*: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
- Rent-to-Price Ratio: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
- Cost of Living: Triple Weight (~9.73 Points)
- Security-Deposit Limit*: Full Weight (~3.24 Points)
Note: This metric measures the maximum security-deposit amount that landlords are allowed to charge in the state. A lower amount is ideal for renters.
Quality of Life – Total Points: 40
- City Satisfaction Index: Full Weight (~4.00 Points)
Note: This metric is based on Sharecare’s Well-Being “Community” Index Score, and refers to residents liking where they live, feeling safe and having pride in their community. - Job Market: Full Weight (~4.00 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Cities for Jobs” ranking. - Driver-Friendliness: Half Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Cities to Drive in” ranking. - Recreation-Friendliness: Full Weight (~4.00 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Cities for Recreation” ranking. - Weather: Half Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Cities with the Best & Worst Weather” ranking. - Quality of Public School System: Half Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: This metric is based on GreatSchools.org’s ratings of U.S. public schools. - Safety: Double Weight (~8.00 Points)
Note: This metric measures the violent- and property-crime rates. - Presence of State Bedbug Laws*: Half Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: This binary metric measures the presence or absence of bedbug laws in the state. Bedbug laws address bedbug infestations in rental properties. - Percentage of Residents Who Are Fully Vaccinated: Triple Weight (~12.00 Points)
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from the U.S. Census Bureau, Council for Community and Economic Research, Zillow, Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies, Insurance Information Institute, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Flex Zone, Federal Bureau of Investigation, GreatSchools.org, NOLO, National Association of REALTORS, Muller Media, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Sharecare-Boston University School of Public Health, and WalletHub research.