Americans today apply the term “foodie” to anyone who loves gourmet dining and foodie culture isn’t limited to restaurants. Foodies enjoy discovering new and unique flavors wherever they can find them, including in their own kitchens and less prominent establishments like street food trucks. For these culinary enthusiasts, the experience of eating is elevated to a hobby or even a lifestyle.
While being a foodie can be quite expensive, culinary hotspots across the U.S. offer plenty of affordable and delicious options. These wallet-friendly cities cater to diners who prefer to cook at home, explore the local flavors or both. To determine the best and cheapest foodie scenes, WalletHub compared more than 180 U.S. cities across 28 key indicators of foodie-friendliness. Our data set ranges from the cost of groceries to the affordability and accessibility of high-quality restaurants to the number of food festivals per capita.
Chip Lupo, WalletHub Analyst
Main Findings
Best Food Cities in America
|
Overall Rank |
City |
Total Score |
Affordability Rank |
Diversity, Accessibility & Quality Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miami, FL | 74.37 | 145 | 1 |
| 2 | San Francisco, CA | 71.66 | 173 | 2 |
| 3 | Orlando, FL | 71.43 | 54 | 3 |
| 4 | Portland, OR | 69.48 | 101 | 4 |
| 5 | Tampa, FL | 69.31 | 76 | 6 |
| 6 | Sacramento, CA | 66.79 | 68 | 8 |
| 7 | Las Vegas, NV | 66.51 | 82 | 9 |
| 8 | Seattle, WA | 64.69 | 176 | 5 |
| 9 | Denver, CO | 64.08 | 121 | 13 |
| 10 | San Diego, CA | 63.74 | 147 | 10 |
| 11 | Atlanta, GA | 63.24 | 167 | 7 |
| 12 | St. Louis, MO | 62.61 | 107 | 14 |
| 13 | Los Angeles, CA | 61.70 | 170 | 12 |
| 14 | Austin, TX | 61.42 | 81 | 16 |
| 15 | Pittsburgh, PA | 61.16 | 12 | 22 |
| 16 | New York, NY | 60.83 | 178 | 11 |
| 17 | Richmond, VA | 59.90 | 63 | 20 |
| 18 | Chicago, IL | 59.11 | 126 | 17 |
| 19 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 58.37 | 115 | 21 |
| 20 | Washington, DC | 58.20 | 134 | 18 |
| 21 | San Antonio, TX | 57.55 | 26 | 33 |
| 22 | Cincinnati, OH | 57.22 | 49 | 29 |
| 23 | Milwaukee, WI | 57.01 | 19 | 36 |
| 24 | Houston, TX | 56.79 | 64 | 27 |
| 25 | Portland, ME | 56.78 | 60 | 31 |
| 26 | Philadelphia, PA | 56.29 | 116 | 23 |
| 27 | Wilmington, DE | 56.26 | 2 | 47 |
| 28 | Honolulu, HI | 56.10 | 169 | 19 |
| 29 | Phoenix, AZ | 55.98 | 117 | 25 |
| 30 | Oakland, CA | 55.89 | 182 | 15 |
| 31 | Grand Rapids, MI | 55.33 | 9 | 45 |
| 32 | Buffalo, NY | 54.93 | 42 | 38 |
| 33 | Salt Lake City, UT | 54.88 | 112 | 32 |
| 34 | St. Petersburg, FL | 54.33 | 22 | 48 |
| 35 | Scottsdale, AZ | 54.20 | 99 | 35 |
| 36 | New Orleans, LA | 54.10 | 158 | 26 |
| 37 | Minneapolis, MN | 54.04 | 52 | 41 |
| 38 | Charleston, SC | 54.03 | 143 | 30 |
| 39 | San Jose, CA | 53.58 | 166 | 24 |
| 40 | Reno, NV | 53.21 | 21 | 51 |
| 41 | Louisville, KY | 53.10 | 55 | 44 |
| 42 | Charlotte, NC | 52.91 | 102 | 40 |
| 43 | Vancouver, WA | 52.77 | 164 | 28 |
| 44 | Raleigh, NC | 52.47 | 104 | 43 |
| 45 | Boston, MA | 52.46 | 114 | 39 |
| 46 | Rochester, NY | 52.08 | 125 | 37 |
| 47 | Indianapolis, IN | 51.83 | 62 | 50 |
| 48 | Tucson, AZ | 51.82 | 95 | 46 |
| 49 | Virginia Beach, VA | 51.26 | 15 | 71 |
| 50 | Cleveland, OH | 51.05 | 77 | 52 |
| 51 | Nashville, TN | 51.05 | 168 | 34 |
| 52 | Springfield, MO | 50.70 | 28 | 82 |
| 53 | Jersey City, NJ | 50.56 | 73 | 57 |
| 54 | Bakersfield, CA | 50.47 | 43 | 69 |
| 55 | El Paso, TX | 50.38 | 10 | 81 |
| 56 | Anaheim, CA | 50.21 | 85 | 53 |
| 56 | Modesto, CA | 50.21 | 58 | 66 |
| 56 | Manchester, NH | 50.21 | 17 | 88 |
| 59 | Aurora, CO | 50.17 | 70 | 63 |
| 60 | Omaha, NE | 49.93 | 45 | 72 |
| 61 | Fresno, CA | 49.93 | 44 | 67 |
| 62 | Stockton, CA | 49.88 | 48 | 74 |
| 63 | Madison, WI | 49.82 | 24 | 80 |
| 64 | Dallas, TX | 49.78 | 98 | 54 |
| 65 | Providence, RI | 49.78 | 80 | 65 |
| 66 | Newark, NJ | 49.76 | 97 | 60 |
| 67 | Jacksonville, FL | 49.62 | 72 | 61 |
| 68 | Columbus, OH | 49.58 | 88 | 62 |
| 69 | Baltimore, MD | 49.57 | 90 | 58 |
| 70 | St. Paul, MN | 49.53 | 38 | 78 |
| 71 | Salem, OR | 49.31 | 1 | 89 |
| 72 | Santa Ana, CA | 49.17 | 149 | 49 |
| 73 | Long Beach, CA | 49.12 | 106 | 59 |
| 74 | Tulsa, OK | 49.02 | 78 | 70 |
| 75 | Burlington, VT | 48.88 | 103 | 73 |
| 76 | Colorado Springs, CO | 48.63 | 123 | 55 |
| 77 | Des Moines, IA | 48.18 | 23 | 97 |
| 78 | Lincoln, NE | 47.76 | 3 | 122 |
| 79 | Albuquerque, NM | 47.76 | 140 | 56 |
| 80 | Greensboro, NC | 47.72 | 51 | 86 |
| 81 | Billings, MT | 47.63 | 30 | 104 |
| 82 | Columbia, SC | 47.58 | 47 | 87 |
| 83 | Tempe, AZ | 47.25 | 113 | 79 |
| 84 | Detroit, MI | 47.16 | 36 | 92 |
| 85 | Oklahoma City, OK | 46.96 | 93 | 83 |
| 86 | Spokane, WA | 46.69 | 150 | 64 |
| 87 | Sioux Falls, SD | 46.68 | 40 | 107 |
| 88 | Knoxville, TN | 46.64 | 144 | 68 |
| 89 | Tallahassee, FL | 46.61 | 13 | 123 |
| 90 | Santa Rosa, CA | 46.59 | 180 | 42 |
| 91 | New Haven, CT | 46.51 | 20 | 121 |
| 92 | Mesa, AZ | 46.46 | 109 | 85 |
| 93 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 46.28 | 50 | 110 |
| 94 | Garden Grove, CA | 46.11 | 146 | 76 |
| 95 | Nashua, NH | 45.97 | 61 | 111 |
| 96 | Fort Worth, TX | 45.94 | 41 | 101 |
| 97 | Toledo, OH | 45.61 | 8 | 135 |
| 98 | Fargo, ND | 45.59 | 5 | 144 |
| 99 | Amarillo, TX | 45.57 | 18 | 138 |
| 100 | Dover, DE | 45.45 | 100 | 112 |
| 101 | Missoula, MT | 45.28 | 4 | 131 |
| 102 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 45.22 | 16 | 125 |
| 103 | Cape Coral, FL | 45.13 | 34 | 127 |
| 104 | Tacoma, WA | 45.02 | 154 | 77 |
| 105 | Hialeah, FL | 44.96 | 153 | 84 |
| 106 | Kansas City, MO | 44.94 | 110 | 94 |
| 107 | Durham, NC | 44.92 | 67 | 103 |
| 108 | Corpus Christi, TX | 44.87 | 14 | 137 |
| 109 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 44.82 | 86 | 116 |
| 110 | Rapid City, SD | 44.82 | 108 | 109 |
| 111 | Oxnard, CA | 44.78 | 87 | 102 |
| 112 | Wichita, KS | 44.68 | 59 | 117 |
| 113 | Baton Rouge, LA | 44.67 | 139 | 90 |
| 114 | Newport News, VA | 44.45 | 32 | 146 |
| 115 | Glendale, AZ | 44.37 | 37 | 130 |
| 116 | Plano, TX | 44.30 | 65 | 114 |
| 117 | Norfolk, VA | 44.19 | 75 | 118 |
| 118 | Worcester, MA | 44.06 | 31 | 142 |
| 119 | South Burlington, VT | 44.05 | 172 | 75 |
| 120 | Irving, TX | 43.91 | 57 | 133 |
| 121 | Bridgeport, CT | 43.66 | 148 | 95 |
| 122 | Casper, WY | 43.49 | 71 | 139 |
| 123 | Huntington Beach, CA | 43.39 | 135 | 98 |
| 124 | Birmingham, AL | 43.37 | 131 | 100 |
| 125 | Fort Wayne, IN | 43.34 | 11 | 154 |
| 126 | Brownsville, TX | 43.21 | 6 | 169 |
| 127 | Fort Smith, AR | 43.13 | 133 | 119 |
| 128 | Winston-Salem, NC | 43.00 | 25 | 153 |
| 129 | Riverside, CA | 42.93 | 119 | 105 |
| 130 | Boise, ID | 42.80 | 155 | 93 |
| 131 | Irvine, CA | 42.79 | 152 | 96 |
| 132 | Chesapeake, VA | 42.79 | 32 | 151 |
| 133 | Oceanside, CA | 42.64 | 142 | 108 |
| 134 | Garland, TX | 42.48 | 39 | 148 |
| 135 | Chandler, AZ | 42.31 | 91 | 129 |
| 136 | Chattanooga, TN | 42.21 | 151 | 113 |
| 137 | Overland Park, KS | 42.13 | 130 | 124 |
| 138 | Bismarck, ND | 42.13 | 96 | 143 |
| 139 | Santa Clarita, CA | 42.02 | 118 | 132 |
| 140 | Glendale, CA | 42.00 | 157 | 106 |
| 141 | Huntington, WV | 41.99 | 29 | 166 |
| 142 | Warwick, RI | 41.77 | 163 | 99 |
| 143 | Aurora, IL | 41.76 | 138 | 128 |
| 144 | Fayetteville, NC | 41.73 | 7 | 170 |
| 145 | Lubbock, TX | 41.68 | 46 | 155 |
| 146 | Charleston, WV | 41.66 | 56 | 165 |
| 147 | Akron, OH | 41.59 | 53 | 150 |
| 148 | Arlington, TX | 41.37 | 66 | 149 |
| 149 | Anchorage, AK | 41.21 | 127 | 126 |
| 150 | Laredo, TX | 40.95 | 35 | 174 |
| 151 | North Las Vegas, NV | 40.91 | 89 | 140 |
| 152 | Gilbert, AZ | 40.83 | 91 | 147 |
| 153 | Yonkers, NY | 40.69 | 179 | 91 |
| 154 | Memphis, TN | 40.54 | 160 | 120 |
| 155 | Little Rock, AR | 40.19 | 122 | 145 |
| 156 | Mobile, AL | 39.83 | 111 | 152 |
| 157 | Chula Vista, CA | 39.80 | 159 | 134 |
| 158 | Huntsville, AL | 39.72 | 105 | 156 |
| 159 | Columbus, GA | 39.67 | 74 | 176 |
| 160 | Fremont, CA | 39.46 | 174 | 115 |
| 161 | Cheyenne, WY | 39.13 | 141 | 158 |
| 162 | Fontana, CA | 39.13 | 84 | 172 |
| 163 | Henderson, NV | 38.82 | 82 | 167 |
| 164 | Las Cruces, NM | 38.52 | 27 | 178 |
| 165 | Columbia, MD | 38.28 | 137 | 161 |
| 166 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 38.28 | 69 | 171 |
| 167 | Ontario, CA | 38.17 | 128 | 159 |
| 168 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 38.03 | 171 | 141 |
| 169 | Juneau, AK | 37.79 | 177 | 136 |
| 170 | Gulfport, MS | 37.72 | 120 | 172 |
| 171 | Peoria, AZ | 37.66 | 132 | 164 |
| 172 | Augusta, GA | 37.17 | 79 | 177 |
| 173 | San Bernardino, CA | 37.15 | 128 | 163 |
| 174 | Grand Prairie, TX | 36.17 | 161 | 160 |
| 175 | Lewiston, ME | 36.06 | 165 | 162 |
| 176 | Moreno Valley, CA | 34.63 | 94 | 175 |
| 177 | West Valley City, UT | 34.38 | 162 | 168 |
| 178 | Shreveport, LA | 33.81 | 124 | 182 |
| 179 | Jackson, MS | 33.78 | 156 | 179 |
| 180 | Nampa, ID | 33.40 | 181 | 157 |
| 181 | Montgomery, AL | 33.34 | 136 | 181 |
| 182 | Pearl City, HI | 31.46 | 175 | 180 |
Note: With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.

- Lowest
- 1. Brownsville, TX
- 2. Laredo, TX
- 3. Fort Smith, AR
- 4. Fayetteville, NC
- 5. Oklahoma City, OK

- Highest
- 178. Fremont, CA
- 179. San Francisco, CA
- 180. Juneau, AK
- 181. Anchorage, AK
- 182. Santa Rosa, CA

- Lowest
- 1. Missoula, MT
- 2. Rapid City, SD
- 3. Worcester, MA
- 4. Modesto, CA
- 5. Gulfport, MS

- Highest
- T-178. Honolulu, HI
- T-178. Pearl City, HI
- 180. Philadelphia, PA
- 181. Juneau, AK
- 182. Anchorage, AK

- Most
- T-1. Miami, FL
- T-1. Las Vegas, NV
- T-1. Orlando, FL
- T-1. San Francisco, CA
- T-1. Chicago, IL

- Fewest
- 178. Juneau, AK
- 179. West Valley City, UT
- 180. Lewiston, ME
- 181. South Burlington, VT
- 182. Pearl City, HI

- Highest
- 1. Cape Coral, FL
- 2. Santa Rosa, CA
- 3. Portland, ME
- T-4. Burlington, VT
- T-4. South Burlington, VT

- Lowest
- 178. Birmingham, AL
- 179. Columbus, GA
- 180. Shreveport, LA
- 181. Montgomery, AL
- 182. Jackson, MS

- Most
- T-1. Orlando, FL
- T-1. Las Vegas, NV
- T-1. Miami, FL
- T-1. Atlanta, GA
- 5. San Antonio, TX

- Fewest
- 177. Casper, WY
- 178. New Haven, CT
- 179. Huntington, WV
- 180. Pearl City, HI
- 181. Lewiston, ME

- Most
- T-1. Santa Rosa, CA
- T-1. Portland, OR
- T-1. Seattle, WA
- T-1. San Diego, CA
- T-1. Portland, ME

- Fewest
- 132. Hialeah, FL
- 133. Arlington, TX
- 134. Garland, TX
- 135. Pembroke Pines, FL
- 136. San Bernardino, CA

- Most
- T-1. Salt Lake City, UT
- T-1. Spokane, WA
- T-1. Richmond, VA
- T-1. Pittsburgh, PA
- T-1. Orlando, FL

- Fewest
- 178. New York, NY
- 179. Laredo, TX
- 180. Columbus, GA
- 181. West Valley City, UT
- 182. Pearl City, HI

- Most
- T-1. St. Louis, MO
- T-1. Orlando, FL
- T-1. Cincinnati, OH
- T-1. Pittsburgh, PA
- T-1. Honolulu, HI

- Fewest
- 178. Santa Clarita, CA
- 179. West Valley City, UT
- 180. Henderson, NV
- 181. South Burlington, VT
- 182. Pearl City, HI
In-Depth Look at the Best Cities for Foodies
Miami, FL
Miami is the best city for foodies, leading the country when it comes to the availability of affordable restaurants rated at least 4.5 stars out of 5. It also has an extremely high number of restaurants per capita.
In addition to having a lot of dining establishments, Miami also has high-quality choices. The city has the 12th-most diversity when it comes to the types of restaurants available, and the 13th-best ratio of full-service restaurants to fast-food chains. On top of that, foodies who want to partake in fine dining can choose from 14 Michelin-starred restaurants. One of them, L'Atelier de Joël Robuchon, even has two Michelin stars.
Finally, Miami is a great place for foodies who enjoy cooking at home. It has the third-most farmers’ markets, ninth-most gourmet specialty food stores, second-most butcher shops and most kitchen supply stores per capita.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco is the second-best city for foodies, offering a very high number of restaurants per capita and one of the best selections of affordable restaurants that are rated at least 4.5 out of 5 stars. San Francisco also currently has a staggering 25 restaurants with Michelin stars, including three establishments with three stars apiece: Atelier Crenn, Benu, and Quince.
In addition, the Golden Gate city has the sixth-best diversity of restaurant types in the country, along with the fourth-best access to healthy food options. San Francisco also has a large number of food festivals and cooking schools per capita, allowing foodies to enjoy new culinary experiences.
To top things off, San Francisco leads the country when it comes to herb and spice stores, international grocery stores and craft breweries per capita.
Orlando, FL
Orlando, FL, is the third-best foodie city, standing out when it comes to the number of food trucks, ice cream shops, coffee and tea shops, and gourmet food stores per capita. Like the other top cities, it also has a very high number of restaurant choices, especially ones with at least 4.5 out of 5 stars.
Orlando is home to seven Michelin-starred restaurants, all of which hold one star each, including Camille, Papa Llama and Soseki. Additionally, the city has the ninth-best diversity of restaurant choices in the country.
Ask the Experts
Wallet-conscious foodies don’t always have to sacrifice quality for price. For money-saving advice and policy-related tips for improving the local food scene, we asked a panel of experts to weigh in with their thoughts on the following key questions:
- What tips can you provide to foodies on a tight budget?
- In evaluating the best foodie cities for your wallet, what are the top five indicators?
- What are the dining out trends for 2024 and how is inflation affecting Americans’ eating out habits?
- What tips can you offer to health-conscious foodies who like to eat out?
- What role, if any, can local authorities play in improving the food scene in their city?
Ask the Experts
ISHC – Executive Director, OL Academic Programs, Associate Professor of the Practice – Boston University School of Hospitality Administration
Read More
Professor, Hospitality Management – Northampton Community College
Read More
Ph.D., D.M., CHE, CC – President of SECSA Federation; COIA (Coalition on Intercollegiate Athletics) Steering Committee; AHLEI Master Trainer; Associate Professor, Retail, Hospitality, and Tourism Management – University of Tennessee Knoxville
Read More
C.E.C. – Department Chair/ Culinary Instructor, The Culinary Academy – Contra Costa College
Read More
Methodology
In order to determine the best and cheapest local foodie scenes, WalletHub compared 182 cities — including the 150 most populated U.S. cities, plus at least two of the most populated cities in each state — across two key dimensions, “Affordability” and “Diversity, Accessibility & Quality.”
We evaluated those dimensions using 28 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions and costs for foodies. For metrics marked with an asterisk (*), we used the square root of the population to calculate the population size in order to avoid overcompensating for minor differences across cities.
Finally, we determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order the cities in our sample. In determining our sample, we considered only the “city proper” in each case and excluded surrounding cities in the metro area.
Affordability – Total Points: 30
- Cost of Groceries: Double Weight (~7.50 Points)
- Accessibility & Affordability of High-Quality Restaurants: Full Weight (~3.75 Points)
Note: This metric measures the prevalence of affordable restaurants with ratings of at least 4.5 stars. - Restaurant Meal Cost: Double Weight (~7.50 Points)
- Sales Tax: Full Weight (~3.75 Points)
- Food Tax: Full Weight (~3.75 Points)
- Average Beer & Wine Price: Full Weight (~3.75 Points)
Note: “Average Beer Price” refers to the average price, excluding any deposit, of a six-pack of 12-ounce Heineken containers, and “Average Wine Price” refers to the average price of a 1.5-liter bottle of Chablis or Chenin Blanc or any white table wine.
Diversity, Accessibility & Quality – Total Points: 70
- Restaurants per Capita*: Triple Weight (~8.08 Points)
- Ratio of Full-Service Restaurants to Fast-Food Establishments: Triple Weight (~8.08 Points)
- Growth in Number of Full Service Restaurants (2022 vs 2017): Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- Restaurant Diversity: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- Presence of Michelin-Starred Restaurants: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- Average Ranking of Restaurants on Yelp’s “Top 100 Places to Eat in the U.S.” List: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- Food Trucks per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- Access to Healthy Food Options: Double Weight (~5.38 Points)
- Farmers Markets & CSA Programs per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
Note: “CSA” refers to community-supported agriculture. - Food Freshness: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
Note: The share of workers involved in agricultural activities was used as a proxy for this metric. - Ice Cream & Frozen Yogurt Shops per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- Craft Breweries & Wine Bars per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- Coffee & Tea Shops per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- Gourmet Specialty-Food Stores per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
Note: “Gourmet Specialty-Food Stores” includes, among others, candy stores, chocolatiers and cheese shops. - Grocery Stores per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- International Grocery Stores per Capita*: Half Weight (~1.35 Points)
- Butcher Shops per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- Herbs & Spices Stores per Capita*: Half Weight (~1.35 Points)
- Kitchen Supplies Stores per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- Food Festivals per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- Cooking Schools per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
- Food & Wine Tours per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.69 Points)
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected as of September 2, 2024 from the U.S. Census Bureau, Council for Community and Economic Research, Federation of Tax Administrators, Tax Foundation, County Health Rankings, Avalara, Wikipedia, Numbeo, TripAdvisor and Yelp.






WalletHub experts are widely quoted. Contact our media team to schedule an interview.