U.S. economic growth depends heavily on the performance of individual states. But some contribute more than others. California, for instance, is the fifth largest economy in the world, boasting a GDP larger than that of countries like the U.K., France and India. Meanwhile, Vermont’s GDP is around 91 times smaller, at $36.7 billion compared to California’s $3.4 trillion.
In order to determine which states are pulling the most weight even during this time of economic difficulty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, WalletHub compared the 50 states and the District of Columbia across 28 key indicators of economic performance and strength. Our data set ranges from GDP growth to startup activity to the share of jobs in high-tech industries.
Main Findings
State Economy Rankings
| Overall Rank | State | Total Score | Economic Activity | Economic Health | Innovation Potential |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Washington | 73.83 | 3 | 7 | 2 |
| 2 | Utah | 71.33 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| 3 | California | 70.30 | 1 | 31 | 3 |
| 4 | Massachusetts | 67.28 | 6 | 35 | 1 |
| 5 | New Hampshire | 58.86 | 18 | 13 | 4 |
| 6 | Colorado | 58.84 | 13 | 6 | 9 |
| 7 | North Carolina | 56.83 | 14 | 12 | 11 |
| 8 | Georgia | 56.54 | 5 | 15 | 24 |
| 9 | Oregon | 55.86 | 15 | 23 | 7 |
| 10 | District of Columbia | 54.74 | 9 | 14 | 13 |
| 11 | Tennessee | 54.61 | 4 | 5 | 38 |
| 12 | Texas | 54.16 | 8 | 9 | 23 |
| 13 | Idaho | 53.57 | 22 | 2 | 16 |
| 14 | Florida | 52.68 | 10 | 3 | 33 |
| 15 | Michigan | 52.57 | 16 | 40 | 5 |
| 16 | Maryland | 50.65 | 25 | 36 | 6 |
| 17 | Arizona | 50.64 | 17 | 19 | 20 |
| 18 | Montana | 49.61 | 12 | 10 | 34 |
| 19 | Minnesota | 49.04 | 23 | 18 | 17 |
| 20 | Virginia | 47.15 | 27 | 16 | 22 |
| 21 | New York | 47.12 | 11 | 50 | 21 |
| 22 | Indiana | 46.44 | 21 | 20 | 30 |
| 23 | New Jersey | 46.24 | 19 | 51 | 12 |
| 24 | Iowa | 46.12 | 24 | 21 | 26 |
| 25 | Connecticut | 45.10 | 38 | 43 | 8 |
| 26 | Nevada | 44.77 | 7 | 32 | 44 |
| 27 | Wisconsin | 44.25 | 43 | 17 | 18 |
| 28 | Delaware | 43.68 | 34 | 29 | 15 |
| 29 | Nebraska | 43.60 | 29 | 8 | 36 |
| 30 | South Carolina | 42.36 | 20 | 27 | 39 |
| 31 | Missouri | 41.38 | 33 | 28 | 28 |
| 32 | Illinois | 41.13 | 26 | 41 | 29 |
| 33 | Pennsylvania | 40.48 | 31 | 48 | 19 |
| 34 | Alabama | 40.24 | 32 | 25 | 35 |
| 35 | Kansas | 39.78 | 40 | 26 | 31 |
| 36 | Rhode Island | 39.19 | 37 | 39 | 27 |
| 37 | South Dakota | 38.70 | 42 | 4 | 47 |
| 38 | North Dakota | 38.41 | 46 | 11 | 37 |
| 39 | Ohio | 38.09 | 30 | 46 | 32 |
| 40 | New Mexico | 38.07 | 44 | 49 | 14 |
| 41 | Vermont | 37.99 | 48 | 30 | 25 |
| 42 | Kentucky | 36.03 | 28 | 37 | 46 |
| 43 | Arkansas | 35.88 | 35 | 22 | 45 |
| 44 | Maine | 35.37 | 36 | 34 | 42 |
| 45 | Wyoming | 34.38 | 39 | 24 | 49 |
| 46 | Mississippi | 32.19 | 41 | 47 | 43 |
| 47 | Oklahoma | 31.32 | 50 | 38 | 40 |
| 48 | Hawaii | 30.59 | 47 | 33 | 50 |
| 49 | Louisiana | 29.39 | 45 | 44 | 48 |
| 50 | Alaska | 27.61 | 51 | 45 | 41 |
| 51 | West Virginia | 26.10 | 49 | 42 | 51 |
Note: With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that state, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.
- Highest Change
- 1. Tennessee
- 2. New Hampshire
- 3. California
- 4. Nevada
- 5. Indiana
- Lowest Change
- 47. Louisiana
- 48. Oklahoma
- 49. North Dakota
- 50. Wyoming
- 51. Alaska
- Most Exports
- T-1. Louisiana
- T-1. Texas
- T-1. Alaska
- T-1. Washington
- T-1. Oregon
- Fewest Exports
- 47. Arkansas
- 48. Montana
- 49. Colorado
- 50. Oklahoma
- 51. Hawaii
- Most Activity
- 1. Florida
- 2. Nevada
- 3. Utah
- 4. Idaho
- 5. Colorado
- Least Activity
- 47. Wisconsin
- 48. Ohio
- 49. Vermont
- 50. West Virginia
- 51. Iowa
- Lowest Rate
- T-1. Utah
- T-1. Nebraska
- T-1. New Hampshire
- T-1. Kansas
- T-1. Minnesota
- Highest Rate
- T-45. Connecticut
- T-45. Pennsylvania
- 48. New York
- 49. Michigan
- 50. Alaska
- 51. District of Columbia
- Highest Change
- 1. Nevada
- 2. Hawaii
- 3. Texas
- 4. California
- 5. New Mexico
- Lowest Change
- 47. South Dakota
- 48. Wisconsin
- 49. Alabama
- 50. Alaska
- 51. Ohio
- Highest Income
- 1. Virginia
- 2. Utah
- 3. Minnesota
- 4. New Jersey
- 5. Maryland
- Lowest Income
- 47. Vermont
- 48. Louisiana
- 49. New Mexico
- 50. Maine
- 51. West Virginia
- Highest Surplus per Capita
- T-1. Wyoming
- T-1. Wisconsin
- 3. North Dakota
- 4. Hawaii
- 5. Connecticut
- Lowest Surplus per Capita
- 46. Oregon
- 47. Michigan
- 48. New Mexico
- 49. New York
- 50. Alaska
- Highest Average
- 1. District of Columbia
- 2. Washington
- 3. Wyoming
- 4. Montana
- 5. New Hampshire
- Lowest Average
- 47. New Mexico
- 48. Delaware
- 49. Oklahoma
- 50. South Dakota
- 51. Mississippi
- Highest Percentage
- 1. Massachusetts
- 2. Washington
- 3. New Mexico
- 4. New Hampshire
- 5. California
- Lowest Percentage
- 47. Mississippi
- 48. Louisiana
- 49. Wyoming
- 50. West Virginia
- 51. Arkansas
- Most Patents
- T-1. Massachusetts
- T-1. California
- T-1. Washington
- 4. Oregon
- 5. Connecticut
- Fewest Patents
- 47. Hawaii
- 48. Louisiana
- 49. West Virginia
- 50. Mississippi
- 51. Alaska
Ask the Experts
Not all economic growth strategies are effective. For the best ways to stimulate the economy and achieve lasting prosperity, we asked a panel of experts to share their thoughts on the following key questions:
- What are the most effective ways for state and local officials to help their local economies recover from the impact of the pandemic?
- What can states do to prevent “brain drain” and develop, attract and retain highly skilled workers?
- States often compete for business investment by offering tax breaks and other incentives. Do such efforts more often result in a net positive or net negative impact on state economies? Do such efforts create a “race to the bottom” across states?
- What makes a state attractive to potential entrepreneurs?
- In evaluating the states with the best economies, what are the top five indicators?
Ask the Experts
Assistant Professor of Political Science, Director of Political Economy Program, College of Arts & Sciences – Ashland University
Read More
Robert Kavesh Professor of Economics; General Editor, Review of Industrial Organization – Stern School of Business, New York University
Read More
Chair & Professor of Economics – University of Oklahoma
Read More
Assistant Professor, Economics – George Mason University
Read More
Methodology
In order to determine the best state economies, WalletHub compared the 50 states and the District of Columbia across three key dimensions: 1) Economic Activity, 2) Economic Health and 3) Innovation Potential.
We evaluated those dimensions using 28 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the highest economic performance.
We then determined each state and the District’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order our sample.
Economic Activity – Total Points: 33.33
- Change in GDP (2021 vs. 2020): Quadruple Weight (~13.33 Points)
- Share of Fast-Growing Firms: Triple Weight (~10.00 Points)
Note: This metric measures the number of firms in Deloitte’s Technology Fast 500 list as a percentage of total firms. - State Gross Public Debt as Percent of GDP: Full Weight (~3.33 Points)
- Exports per Capita: Full Weight (~3.33 Points)
- Startup Activity: Full Weight (~3.33 Points)
Note: This metric measures the rate of newly established firms.
Economic Health – Total Points: 33.33
- Unemployment Rate: Double Weight (~4.30 Points)
- Underemployment Rate: Half Weight (~1.08 Points)
- Change in Nonfarm Payrolls (2021 vs. 2020): Full Weight (~2.15 Points)
- Change in Total Civilian Labor Force (2021 vs. 2020): Full Weight (~2.15 Points)
- Increase in Ratio of Full-Time Jobs to Part-Time Jobs (2020 vs. 2019): Half Weight (~1.08 Points)
- Median Annual Household Income Adjusted for Cost of Living: Full Weight (~2.15 Points)
- Growth in State Personal Income (2021 vs. 2020): Full Weight (~2.15 Points)
- Government Surplus/Deficit per Capita: Full Weight (~2.15 Points)
- Unfunded Public Pension Plans per Capita: Full Weight (~2.15 Points)
- Share of Uninsured Population: Half Weight (~1.08 Points)
- Share of Population in Poverty: Full Weight (~2.15 Points)
- Foreclosure Rate: Full Weight (~2.15 Points)
- Growth in Number of Businesses (2020 vs. 2019): Full Weight (~2.15 Points)
- Fiscal Health: Full Weight (~2.15 Points)
Note: This metric is based on the George Mason University Mercatus Center’s state fiscal rankings, particularly the State Fiscal Condition Index, which refers to the sum of cash, budget, long-run, service-level and trust-fund solvency indices for each state. - Building-Permit Activity: Full Weight (~2.15 Points)
Note: This metric measures the total number of new privately owned residential-building permits issued annually per capita. - Average Educational Attainment of Recent Immigrants: Half Weight (~1.08 Points)
Note: The educational attainment of recent immigrants aged 25 and older from a foreign country is classified as having either no high school diploma; a high school diploma or equivalent; some college experience or an associate’s degree; a bachelor’s degree; or a graduate or professional degree. - Average Educational Attainment of Recent Migrants from Other U.S. States: Half Weight (~1.08 Points)
Note: The educational attainment of recent migrants aged 25 and older from other states within the U.S. is classified as having either no high school diploma; a high school diploma or equivalent; some college experience or an associate’s degree; a bachelor’s degree; or a graduate or professional degree.
Innovation Potential – Total Points: 33.33
- Share of Jobs in High-Tech Industries: Full Weight (~5.56 Points)
- Share of Jobs STEM Employment: Full Weight (~5.56 Points)
- Independent Inventor Patents per 1,000 Working-Age Population: Full Weight (~5.56 Points)
- Industry R&D Investment Amount per Total Civilian Employed Population: Full Weight (~5.56 Points)
Note: “R&D” refers to research and development. - Nonindustry R&D Investment Amount as Share of GDP: Full Weight (~5.56 Points)
Note: “R&D” refers to research and development. - Entrepreneurial Activity: Full Weight (~5.56 Points)
Note: This metric is based on the Kauffman Index of Startup Activity, which is an equally weighted index of four normalized measures of startup activity, as defined by the Kauffman Foundation: the Rate of New Entrepreneurs (percentage of adults becoming entrepreneurs in a given month); the Opportunity Share of New Entrepreneurs (percentage of new entrepreneurs driven primarily by “opportunity” vs. “necessity”); the Startup Early Job Creation (the number of jobs created in the first year of business per capita); and the Startup Early Survival Rate (the rate of survival in the first year of business).
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from the U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Deloitte, United Health Foundation, American Legislative Exchange Council, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Council for Community and Economic Research, ATTOM Data Solutions, United States Patent and Trademark Office, usgovernmentspending.com, National Science Foundation, and Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.