While the U.S. is one of the most educated countries in the world, it doesn’t provide the same quality elementary school or secondary school education to all students. In many states, more affluent school districts receive a greater amount of funding per student than poorer districts, with one estimate claiming that low-income districts are underfunded by around $6,700 per pupil.
Discrepancies between the rich and poor have been exacerbated even more due to the lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Low-income students have suffered the greatest “learning loss” due to partial or total remote learning. One contributing factor is that people in low-income districts are less likely to have the technological resources they need.
States that provide equitable funding to all school districts can help prevent poor students from having lower graduation rates, lower rates of pursuing higher education and smaller future incomes than their wealthy peers. The difference is dramatic: College graduates have $154 - $1,115 higher median weekly earnings than people with a high school diploma and no college experience, depending on the degree.
Wisconsin has the 12th most equitable school districts in the U.S. overall, but some districts within the state are fairer than others. To find out where school funding is distributed most equitably, WalletHub scored 421 districts in Wisconsin based on two metrics: average household income and expenditures for public elementary and secondary schools per pupil.
Note: For visual purposes, we included only the top 7 school districts by enrollment from each category. Rank 1 on the “Expenditures Ranking” means highest expenditures and Rank 1 on “Income Ranking” means lowest income.
Most & Least Equitable School Districts in Wisconsin
|Rank*||School District||Score||Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Schools per Pupil||Income by School District|
|1||Augusta School District||0.02||$14,455||$61,379|
|2||Benton School District||0.05||$15,141||$57,868|
|3||Seneca Area School District||0.07||$14,945||$58,846|
|4||Dodgeland School District||0.12||$13,631||$65,607|
|5||Luxemburg-Casco School District||0.24||$11,590||$75,677|
|6||Beecher-Dunbar-Pembine School District||0.25||$19,058||$37,955|
|7||Cassville School District||0.35||$16,525||$51,149|
|8||Gilmanton School District||0.36||$14,950||$59,107|
|9||Genoa City J2 School District||0.4||$13,028||$68,846|
|10||Cuba City School District||0.42||$14,413||$61,295|
|11||Burlington Area School District||0.58||$12,579||$71,235|
|12||River Valley School District||0.62||$13,612||$65,208|
|13||Denmark School District||0.65||$11,025||$78,255|
|14||Mosinee School District||0.75||$11,768||$74,435|
|15||Slinger School District||0.78||$10,286||$82,948|
|16||River Falls School District||0.78||$10,642||$80,099|
|17||Hartford J1 School District||0.89||$13,202||$68,294|
|18||Elk Mound Area School District||0.97||$10,767||$79,341|
|19||Columbus School District||1.05||$12,298||$72,966|
|20||Amery School District||1.05||$13,000||$68,009|
|21||De Pere School District||1.15||$10,361||$82,815|
|22||Granton Area School District||1.25||$15,261||$56,458|
|23||Valders Area School District||1.36||$12,150||$72,098|
|24||Raymond #14 School District||1.41||$10,788||$80,833|
|25||Weston School District||1.44||$14,574||$61,736|
|26||Gresham School District||1.52||$15,185||$58,702|
|27||Kaukauna Area School District||1.53||$11,589||$76,872|
|28||Shiocton School District||1.55||$12,822||$70,655|
|29||Whitnall School District||1.61||$11,542||$77,159|
|30||Cudahy School District||1.61||$14,291||$63,280|
In order to rank the states with the most and least equitable school districts, WalletHub first scored 12,876 school districts throughout the U.S. based on two metrics: average household income and expenditures for public elementary and secondary schools per pupil.
For expenditures, for each 1 percent above the state's average we removed 1 point from a base score of 50 points for each district. For household income, for each 1 percent above the state's average we added 1 point to a base score of 50 points for each district. The inverse was true for each 1 percent below the state's average.
The final score for each district was calculated by taking the absolute difference between the score for expenditures and the score for household income. We then ranked the districts based on the total score, with the lowest value, representing the most equitable, being ranked 1.
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from of the U.S. Census Bureau and the National Center for Education Statistics.