While the U.S. is one of the most educated countries in the world, it doesn’t provide the same quality elementary school or secondary school education to all students. In many states, more affluent school districts receive a greater amount of funding per student than poorer districts.
Discrepancies between the rich and poor have been exacerbated even more this year by the COVID-19 pandemic. As states decide whether their school districts will have in-person learning this fall, studies show that low-income students will suffer the greatest “learning loss” due to partial or total remote learning. One contributing factor is that people in low-income districts are less likely to have the technological resources they need.
States that provide equitable funding to all school districts can help prevent poor students from having lower graduation rates, lower rates of pursuing higher education and smaller future incomes than their wealthy peers. The difference is dramatic: College graduates have $460 - $1,154 higher median weekly earnings than people with a high school diploma and no college experience, depending on the degree.
Wisconsin has the 19th most equitable school districts in the U.S. overall, but some districts within the state are fairer than others. To find out where school funding is distributed most equitably, WalletHub scored 422 districts in Wisconsin based on two metrics: average household income and expenditures for public elementary and secondary schools per pupil. Read on for the district ranking and a complete description of our methodology.
Note: For visual purposes, we included only the top 7 school districts by enrollment from each category. Rank 1 on the “Expenditures Ranking” means highest expenditures and Rank 1 on “Income Ranking” means lowest income.
Most & Least Equitable School Districts in Wisconsin
|Rank*||School District||Score||Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Schools per Pupil||Income by School District|
|1||Alma School District||0.14||$13,971||$58,333|
|2||Augusta Joint School District 1||0.3||$13,879||$58,884|
|3||Edgerton School District 8||0.44||$12,509||$65,691|
|4||Desoto Joint School District 9||0.6||$14,620||$55,441|
|5||Oakfield School District||0.82||$11,565||$69,519|
|6||Shiocton Joint School District 2||0.99||$12,387||$66,635|
|7||Lake Holcombe School District||1.01||$14,653||$54,261|
|8||Benton Joint School District 1||1.13||$14,019||$57,292|
|9||Siren School District||1.28||$16,603||$46,150|
|10||West Salem School District||1.43||$10,493||$74,390|
|11||Evansville Community School District||1.43||$11,899||$69,307|
|12||Cedar Grove Belgium School District||1.65||$11,051||$73,606|
|13||Goodman Armstrong School District||1.69||$18,000||$39,559|
|14||Oak Creek-Franklin School District||1.94||$10,807||$72,523|
|15||Campbellsport School District||2||$11,213||$70,495|
|16||Cuba City School District||2.11||$13,034||$61,500|
|17||Wabeno Joint School District 1||2.22||$16,517||$47,168|
|18||Valders School District||2.26||$12,031||$69,184|
|19||Slinger School District||2.29||$9,585||$81,197|
|20||Delavan Darien School District||2.32||$13,805||$57,584|
|21||Darlington Community School District||2.48||$14,009||$56,483|
|22||West De Pere School District||2.58||$10,441||$73,915|
|23||Brown Deer School District||2.65||$13,625||$61,616|
|24||Raymond School District 14||2.77||$11,167||$70,234|
|25||Parkview School District||2.77||$12,747||$66,000|
|26||Twin Lakes School District 4||2.99||$12,991||$61,150|
|27||Seneca Joint School District||3.15||$14,066||$55,781|
|28||Wrightstown School District||3.31||$10,248||$78,596|
|29||Potosi Joint School District 10||3.64||$14,221||$54,708|
|30||Iowa-Grant School District||3.68||$13,934||$56,090|
In order to rank the states with the most and least equitable school districts, WalletHub first scored 12,919 school districts throughout the U.S. based on two metrics: average household income and expenditures for public elementary and secondary schools per pupil.
For expenditures, for each 1 percent above the state's average we removed 1 point from a base score of 50 points for each district. For household income, for each 1 percent above the state's average we added 1 point to a base score of 50 points for each district. The inverse was true for each 1 percent below the state's average.
The final score for each district was calculated by taking the absolute difference between the score for expenditures and the score for household income. We then ranked the districts based on the total score, with the lowest value, representing the most equitable, being ranked 1.
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from of the U.S. Census Bureau and the National Center for Education Statistics.