While good elementary schools, high schools and colleges are important factors for parents to consider when choosing where to settle down, the availability of quality pre-K education is just as crucial. In 2021, many parents are left wondering whether their children will be able to attend pre-school in person due to the COVID-19 pandemic. If early education programs are closed, children may be left less prepared for kindergarten both socially and academically.
A study by the National Institute for Early Education Research showed that students enrolled in full-day pre-K programs do better on math and literacy tests than their peers who attend only partial day preschool. In addition, those who attend pre-K programs have been shown to have less risk of future crime than those who do not. Plus, early education programs may generate billions of dollars for the economy over a few decades, due to lessening the need for social services and creating more productive citizens.
To help parents find the states with the best early education systems, WalletHub compared the 50 states and the District of Columbia across 12 key metrics, including share of school districts that offer a state pre-K program, number of pre-K quality benchmarks met and total reported spending per child enrolled in pre-K.
Main Findings
States with the Best & Worst Early Education Systems
Overall Rank | State | Total Score | ‘Access’ Rank | ‘Quality’ Rank | ‘Resources & Economic Support’ Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | District of Columbia | 75.41 | 1 | 15 | 3 |
2 | Nebraska | 73.47 | 4 | 2 | 22 |
3 | Maryland | 70.01 | 10 | 3 | 11 |
4 | West Virginia | 68.26 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
5 | Arkansas | 66.52 | 23 | 1 | 15 |
6 | Vermont | 65.81 | 2 | 44 | 14 |
7 | Rhode Island | 62.96 | 30 | 6 | 1 |
8 | Alabama | 62.44 | 14 | 6 | 23 |
9 | Kentucky | 58.53 | 12 | 13 | 20 |
10 | Oregon | 58.27 | 17 | 18 | 2 |
11 | Oklahoma | 57.85 | 5 | 38 | 13 |
12 | Illinois | 56.79 | 3 | 42 | 28 |
13 | South Carolina | 56.70 | 13 | 14 | 33 |
14 | New Jersey | 55.54 | 11 | 23 | 12 |
15 | Tennessee | 55.49 | 20 | 12 | 30 |
16 | Delaware | 55.05 | 22 | 16 | 8 |
17 | Wisconsin | 54.85 | 6 | 37 | 43 |
18 | Connecticut | 54.75 | 18 | 34 | 4 |
19 | Michigan | 54.18 | 16 | 25 | 7 |
20 | Iowa | 53.84 | 8 | 36 | 31 |
21 | New Mexico | 53.55 | 9 | 38 | 25 |
22 | Washington | 53.48 | 19 | 19 | 18 |
23 | Maine | 52.99 | 15 | 38 | 10 |
24 | Virginia | 51.30 | 48 | 4 | 27 |
25 | Texas | 50.76 | 40 | 5 | 47 |
26 | California | 48.77 | 27 | 24 | 9 |
27 | Georgia | 48.08 | 44 | 9 | 38 |
28 | Ohio | 47.74 | 26 | 17 | 42 |
29 | Mississippi | 47.08 | 29 | 25 | 16 |
30 | North Carolina | 46.49 | 46 | 10 | 29 |
31 | Louisiana | 44.97 | 47 | 11 | 26 |
32 | Alaska | 44.96 | 25 | 25 | 50 |
33 | Hawaii | 44.52 | 24 | 42 | 36 |
34 | Florida | 43.89 | 34 | 21 | 45 |
35 | Colorado | 43.73 | 41 | 20 | 24 |
36 | Wyoming | 42.50 | 31 | 25 | 39 |
37 | South Dakota | 42.08 | 33 | 25 | 39 |
38 | Nevada | 41.75 | 28 | 44 | 34 |
39 | Utah | 40.70 | 37 | 25 | 39 |
40 | Montana | 40.63 | 36 | 47 | 17 |
41 | Kansas | 40.03 | 21 | 50 | 21 |
42 | Idaho | 39.75 | 38 | 25 | 44 |
43 | New York | 39.14 | 42 | 44 | 19 |
44 | New Hampshire | 39.13 | 35 | 25 | 49 |
45 | Pennsylvania | 38.45 | 45 | 35 | 35 |
46 | Minnesota | 38.21 | 50 | 41 | 5 |
47 | Massachusetts | 36.17 | 43 | 48 | 32 |
48 | Arizona | 36.12 | 49 | 22 | 37 |
49 | North Dakota | 31.93 | 32 | 51 | 46 |
50 | Missouri | 29.18 | 39 | 49 | 51 |
51 | Indiana | 24.20 | 51 | 25 | 48 |
Ask the Experts
Giving a child a good early education is something that can benefit them for their entire career as a student. For more insight into this vital developmental step, we consulted a panel of experts. Click on the experts below to read their bios and thoughts on the following key questions:
- What are the most important factors that influence a child’s educational development?
- Is education spending a direct measure of education quality?
- How can residents know whether their tax dollars are being used wisely by local authorities on early education?
- What can state and local policymakers do to improve their school systems without raising taxes?
- In evaluating the best and worst early education systems, what are the top 5 indicators?
- What aspects should policymakers take into account in order to ensure safe access to early education systems during this crisis?
Ask the Experts
- Daniel J. Castner
Ph.D. – Assistant Professor, Early Childhood Education Indiana University School of Education
Read More
- Arthur Hochman
Ed.D. – Professor of Education, College of Education, Butler University
Read More
- Julia Smith
Ph.D. – Assistant Professor of ECE, School of Education, Purdue University Fort Wayne
Read More
- T. Kevin McGowan
Ph.D. – Assistant Professor, Department of Elementary and Early Childhood Education, Early Education and Care Program Faculty Associate – Martin Richard Institute for Social Justice, Bridgewater State University
Read More
- Herminia Janet Rivera
Ph.D. – Associate Professor, Institutional Review Board Representative, Abraham S. Fischler College of Education & School of Criminal Justice, Nova Southeastern University
Read More
- Hannah Kye
Ed.D. – Assistant Professor, Interdisciplinary & Inclusive Education Principal Investigator, Family-Friendly Campus – Rowan University
Read More
Methodology
In order to determine the best and worst states for early education systems, WalletHub compared the 50 states and the District of Columbia across three key dimensions, “Access,” “Quality” and “Resources & Economic Support.”
We evaluated those dimensions using 12 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the highest quality of early education.
Finally, we determined each state and the District’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order our sample.
Access – Total Points: 40
- Share of School Districts that Offer State Pre-K Program: Full Weight (~5.71 Points)
- Share of 3- and 4-year-olds Enrolled in State Pre-K Program: Double Weight (~11.43 Points)
- Share of 3- and 4-year-olds Enrolled in Pre-K, Pre-K Special Education and Head Start Programs: Full Weight (~5.71 Points)
- Presence of Waiting Lists or Frozen Intake for Child Care Assistance: Double Weight (~11.43 Points)
Note: Even if families are eligible for child care assistance, they may not necessarily receive it. Instead, their state may place eligible families on a waiting list or freeze intake (turn away eligible families without adding their names to a waiting list). Families may remain on the waiting list for a long time before receiving child care assistance, or may never receive it. - Pre-K Program Growth: Full Weight (~5.71 Points)
Quality – Total Points: 40
- Pre-K Quality Benchmarks Met: Full Weight (~10.00 Points)
Note: This metric considers the following benchmarks: 1) Early learning & development standards, 2) Curriculum supports, 3) Teacher has BA, 4) Specialized training in pre-K, 5) Assistant teacher has CDA or equivalent, 6) Staff professional development, 7) Class size 20 or lower, 8) Staff-child ratio 1:10 or better, 9) Vision, hearing, & health screening & referral, 10) Continuous quality improvement system. - Income Requirement for State Pre-K Eligibility: Full Weight (~10.00 Points)
- Requirement of School Safety Plans & Audits: Double Weight (~20.00 Points)
Note: This composite metric measures whether school safety plans or school safety audits are required in a state.
Resources & Economic Support – Total Points: 20
- Total Reported Spending per Child Enrolled in Preschool: Double Weight (~5.00 Points)
Note: Amount of all reported funds (local, state, and federal) spent per child participating in pre-K program. - Change in State Spending per Child Enrolled in Preschool (2017-18 to 2018-19): Triple Weight (~7.50 Points)
- Total State Head Start Program Spending per Child Enrolled in Preschool: Double Weight (~5.00 Points)
- Monthly Child Care Co-Payment Fees as Share of Family Income: Full Weight (~2.50 Points)
Note: Parent co-payments for a family of three with an income at 100 percent of poverty and one child in care.
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from the National Institute for Early Education Research, Education Commission of the States and The National Women’s Law Center.
Videos for News Use: