While the U.S. is one of the most educated countries in the world, it doesn’t provide the same quality elementary school or secondary school education to all students. In many states, more affluent school districts receive a greater amount of funding per student than poorer districts.
Discrepancies between the rich and poor have been exacerbated even more this year by the COVID-19 pandemic. Low-income students have suffered the greatest “learning loss” due to partial or total remote learning. One contributing factor is that people in low-income districts are less likely to have the technological resources they need.
States that provide equitable funding to all school districts can help prevent poor students from having lower graduation rates, lower rates of pursuing higher education and smaller future incomes than their wealthy peers. The difference is dramatic: College graduates have $524 - $1,112 higher median weekly earnings than people with a high school diploma and no college experience, depending on the degree.
Washington has the 16th least equitable school districts in the U.S. overall, but some districts within the state are fairer than others. To find out where school funding is distributed most equitably, WalletHub scored 294 districts in Washington based on two metrics: average household income and expenditures for public elementary and secondary schools per pupil. Read on for the district ranking and a complete description of our methodology.
Main Findings
Note: For visual purposes, we included only the top 7 school districts by enrollment from each category.
Most & Least Equitable School Districts in Washington
| Rank* | School District | Score | Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Schools per Pupil | Income by School District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fife School District | 0.04 | $13,252 | $74,972 |
| 2 | Evaline School District | 0.1 | $16,407 | $62,750 |
| 3 | Odessa School District | 0.14 | $18,202 | $55,592 |
| 4 | Damman School District | 0.18 | $12,029 | $79,886 |
| 5 | Columbia (Walla Walla) School District | 0.63 | $14,570 | $69,458 |
| 6 | Waitsburg School District | 0.67 | $15,855 | $64,417 |
| 7 | Highline School District | 0.82 | $15,619 | $65,244 |
| 8 | Lakewood School District | 0.83 | $13,297 | $74,300 |
| 9 | Orting School District | 0.99 | $12,408 | $78,920 |
| 10 | Sedro-Woolley School District | 1.19 | $15,014 | $67,367 |
| 11 | Orchard Prairie School District | 1.22 | $12,962 | $76,905 |
| 12 | Evergreen School District (Clark) | 1.26 | $14,083 | $70,960 |
| 13 | Quilcene School District | 1.32 | $16,990 | $61,250 |
| 14 | Onion Creek School District | 1.34 | $25,205 | $27,500 |
| 15 | Ferndale School District | 1.57 | $14,369 | $71,633 |
| 16 | Federal Way School District | 1.7 | $14,405 | $71,577 |
| 17 | Woodland School District | 1.75 | $14,476 | $71,330 |
| 18 | Burlington-Edison School District | 1.95 | $14,917 | $67,268 |
| 19 | Pateros School District | 1.97 | $17,480 | $59,750 |
| 20 | Coulee-Hartline School District | 2.13 | $17,683 | $56,354 |
| 21 | Grapeview School District | 2.42 | $13,855 | $71,110 |
| 22 | Auburn School District | 2.75 | $13,749 | $71,319 |
| 23 | Coupeville School District | 2.86 | $14,960 | $66,524 |
| 24 | Valley School District | 2.86 | $20,967 | $43,077 |
| 25 | Cape Flattery School District | 2.87 | $20,530 | $44,776 |
| 26 | Blaine School District | 3.15 | $14,575 | $67,843 |
| 27 | North Thurston Public Schools | 3.18 | $13,723 | $71,147 |
| 28 | Mount Vernon School District | 3.29 | $15,262 | $65,068 |
| 29 | Tumwater School District | 3.35 | $13,644 | $75,591 |
| 30 | Bethel School District | 3.64 | $13,415 | $76,670 |
*1=Most Equitable
Methodology
In order to rank the states with the most and least equitable school districts, WalletHub first scored 12,927 school districts throughout the U.S. based on two metrics: average household income and expenditures for public elementary and secondary schools per pupil.
For expenditures, for each 1 percent above the state's average we removed 1 point from a base score of 50 points for each district. For household income, for each 1 percent above the state's average we added 1 point to a base score of 50 points for each district. The inverse was true for each 1 percent below the state's average.
The final score for each district was calculated by taking the absolute difference between the score for expenditures and the score for household income. We then ranked the districts based on the total score, with the lowest value, representing the most equitable, being ranked 1.
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from the U.S. Census Bureau and the National Center for Education Statistics.