Families move often and for various reasons. In fact, the average American can expect to move an estimated 11.7 times in a lifetime. Moving can be a sign of opportunity, such as a new job or long-term wealth accumulation, but people may also move because of instability such as foreclosure or job loss. During this period of significant inflation, many families might consider moving to a place with a relatively low cost of living.
With families in mind, WalletHub compared more than 180 U.S. cities based on 45 key metrics that consider essential family dynamics, such as the cost of housing, the quality of local school and health-care systems, and the opportunities for fun and recreation. While not perfect — given personal preferences and the limitations of publicly available data — our findings will hopefully give movers a better sense of their options.
Top 5 Places to Raise a Family in 2025
- Fremont, CA
- Overland Park, KS
- Plano, TX
- Irvine, CA
- South Burlington, VT

Chip Lupo, WalletHub Analyst
Main Findings
Best Places to Raise a Family
| Overall Rank | City | Total Score | Family Fun Rank | Health & Safety Rank | Education & Child Care Rank | Affordability Rank | Socio-economics Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fremont, CA | 73.53 | 86 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 1 |
| 2 | Overland Park, KS | 71.66 | 102 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | Plano, TX | 68.55 | 75 | 5 | 19 | 6 | 2 |
| 4 | Irvine, CA | 68.50 | 31 | 3 | 3 | 52 | 11 |
| 5 | South Burlington, VT | 65.07 | 163 | 108 | 1 | 10 | 17 |
| 6 | Seattle, WA | 64.93 | 71 | 93 | 11 | 7 | 14 |
| 7 | Boise, ID | 64.86 | 18 | 26 | 30 | 28 | 18 |
| 8 | Gilbert, AZ | 64.69 | 70 | 16 | 50 | 14 | 4 |
| 9 | Bismarck, ND | 64.57 | 117 | 32 | 64 | 4 | 9 |
| 10 | San Diego, CA | 64.39 | 5 | 21 | 12 | 82 | 30 |
| 11 | Huntington Beach, CA | 63.75 | 90 | 17 | 4 | 103 | 7 |
| 12 | Scottsdale, AZ | 63.15 | 42 | 38 | 76 | 15 | 6 |
| 13 | San Jose, CA | 62.87 | 45 | 20 | 13 | 66 | 21 |
| 14 | Columbia, MD | 62.74 | 87 | 48 | 78 | 2 | 47 |
| 15 | Charleston, SC | 62.56 | 30 | 63 | 29 | 32 | 46 |
| 16 | Austin, TX | 61.97 | 83 | 92 | 27 | 8 | 40 |
| 17 | Fargo, ND | 61.83 | 115 | 28 | 60 | 13 | 20 |
| 18 | Sioux Falls, SD | 61.59 | 130 | 31 | 48 | 19 | 22 |
| 19 | Lincoln, NE | 61.58 | 62 | 34 | 69 | 20 | 22 |
| 20 | Virginia Beach, VA | 61.53 | 146 | 10 | 22 | 35 | 24 |
| 21 | San Francisco, CA | 61.40 | 15 | 67 | 16 | 56 | 67 |
| 22 | Portland, OR | 61.00 | 34 | 116 | 7 | 33 | 86 |
| 23 | Chandler, AZ | 60.99 | 73 | 37 | 55 | 38 | 8 |
| 24 | Omaha, NE | 60.90 | 79 | 64 | 28 | 21 | 66 |
| 25 | Madison, WI | 60.85 | 88 | 42 | 102 | 5 | 25 |
| 26 | Chesapeake, VA | 60.80 | 95 | 24 | 47 | 31 | 38 |
| 27 | Warwick, RI | 60.39 | 182 | 1 | 33 | 17 | 50 |
| 28 | Honolulu, HI | 59.92 | 23 | 8 | 21 | 130 | 35 |
| 29 | Nashua, NH | 59.74 | 154 | 27 | 42 | 37 | 36 |
| 30 | Santa Rosa, CA | 59.05 | 77 | 2 | 44 | 95 | 52 |
| 31 | Huntsville, AL | 58.76 | 101 | 13 | 92 | 42 | 60 |
| 32 | Santa Clarita, CA | 58.56 | 121 | 9 | 5 | 128 | 70 |
| 33 | St. Paul, MN | 58.48 | 17 | 60 | 118 | 18 | 106 |
| 34 | Minneapolis, MN | 58.47 | 27 | 146 | 112 | 3 | 92 |
| 35 | Portland, ME | 58.29 | 159 | 33 | 40 | 47 | 45 |
| 36 | Pearl City, HI | 58.01 | 177 | 14 | 6 | 91 | 13 |
| 37 | Casper, WY | 57.58 | 57 | 89 | 56 | 60 | 32 |
| 38 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 57.27 | 139 | 45 | 137 | 11 | 63 |
| 39 | Pittsburgh, PA | 57.20 | 67 | 75 | 54 | 25 | 127 |
| 40 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 57.15 | 82 | 68 | 17 | 138 | 12 |
| 41 | Sacramento, CA | 57.05 | 3 | 81 | 84 | 78 | 98 |
| 42 | Denver, CO | 57.05 | 9 | 159 | 63 | 34 | 97 |
| 43 | Washington, DC | 57.04 | 68 | 109 | 18 | 23 | 157 |
| 44 | Raleigh, NC | 56.99 | 142 | 73 | 77 | 12 | 72 |
| 45 | Lewiston, ME | 56.98 | 147 | 6 | 35 | 72 | 100 |
| 46 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 56.68 | 141 | 49 | 62 | 24 | 85 |
| 47 | Chula Vista, CA | 56.61 | 106 | 7 | 25 | 133 | 44 |
| 48 | Garden Grove, CA | 56.49 | 48 | 15 | 9 | 173 | 34 |
| 49 | Peoria, AZ | 56.47 | 85 | 51 | 105 | 58 | 28 |
| 50 | Orlando, FL | 56.36 | 8 | 114 | 73 | 55 | 110 |
| 51 | Billings, MT | 56.24 | 138 | 155 | 43 | 29 | 39 |
| 52 | Atlanta, GA | 56.22 | 14 | 119 | 57 | 22 | 158 |
| 53 | St. Petersburg, FL | 56.21 | 66 | 70 | 87 | 51 | 54 |
| 54 | Salt Lake City, UT | 56.01 | 74 | 122 | 100 | 46 | 16 |
| 55 | Cheyenne, WY | 55.93 | 132 | 143 | 70 | 27 | 37 |
| 56 | Henderson, NV | 55.91 | 56 | 35 | 115 | 68 | 55 |
| 57 | Tampa, FL | 55.87 | 4 | 96 | 95 | 70 | 118 |
| 58 | Oklahoma City, OK | 55.57 | 58 | 120 | 91 | 36 | 65 |
| 59 | Oceanside, CA | 55.55 | 108 | 22 | 41 | 139 | 15 |
| 60 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 55.51 | 149 | 12 | 14 | 145 | 71 |
| 61 | Jersey City, NJ | 55.25 | 165 | 11 | 20 | 100 | 82 |
| 62 | Aurora, IL | 55.21 | 107 | 29 | 58 | 81 | 88 |
| 63 | Missoula, MT | 55.02 | 92 | 132 | 15 | 88 | 80 |
| 64 | Colorado Springs, CO | 54.92 | 55 | 112 | 125 | 40 | 61 |
| 65 | Durham, NC | 54.90 | 161 | 133 | 34 | 26 | 76 |
| 66 | Las Vegas, NV | 54.77 | 1 | 61 | 151 | 111 | 120 |
| 67 | Nampa, ID | 54.56 | 52 | 46 | 110 | 80 | 62 |
| 68 | Burlington, VT | 54.47 | 166 | 101 | 46 | 39 | 93 |
| 69 | New York, NY | 54.22 | 6 | 53 | 8 | 170 | 140 |
| 70 | Charlotte, NC | 54.00 | 114 | 117 | 68 | 41 | 81 |
| 71 | Reno, NV | 53.71 | 38 | 66 | 79 | 107 | 91 |
| 72 | Columbus, OH | 53.33 | 60 | 83 | 141 | 45 | 129 |
| 73 | Juneau, AK | 53.18 | 180 | 77 | 111 | 63 | 5 |
| 74 | Des Moines, IA | 53.15 | 145 | 47 | 159 | 16 | 142 |
| 75 | Grand Prairie, TX | 53.15 | 47 | 59 | 165 | 98 | 43 |
| 76 | Los Angeles, CA | 53.00 | 2 | 87 | 37 | 172 | 109 |
| 77 | Amarillo, TX | 52.99 | 81 | 129 | 85 | 74 | 48 |
| 78 | Modesto, CA | 52.97 | 21 | 58 | 158 | 94 | 74 |
| 79 | Boston, MA | 52.93 | 99 | 39 | 39 | 92 | 150 |
| 80 | Rapid City, SD | 52.93 | 135 | 151 | 96 | 48 | 42 |
| 81 | Spokane, WA | 52.52 | 103 | 136 | 81 | 49 | 101 |
| 82 | Anchorage, AK | 52.13 | 134 | 124 | 61 | 85 | 19 |
| 83 | Charleston, WV | 52.12 | 179 | 72 | 154 | 30 | 73 |
| 84 | Glendale, CA | 52.06 | 54 | 19 | 38 | 169 | 79 |
| 85 | Tulsa, OK | 52.04 | 11 | 147 | 147 | 59 | 113 |
| 86 | Kansas City, MO | 51.80 | 37 | 176 | 106 | 43 | 102 |
| 87 | Chicago, IL | 51.75 | 19 | 100 | 72 | 97 | 153 |
| 88 | Yonkers, NY | 51.70 | 178 | 30 | 26 | 113 | 117 |
| 89 | Manchester, NH | 51.68 | 173 | 62 | 109 | 65 | 75 |
| 90 | Fort Worth, TX | 51.65 | 59 | 106 | 157 | 69 | 69 |
| 91 | Long Beach, CA | 51.64 | 24 | 50 | 24 | 174 | 96 |
| 92 | Laredo, TX | 51.60 | 69 | 82 | 23 | 151 | 116 |
| 93 | Phoenix, AZ | 51.45 | 7 | 145 | 145 | 112 | 77 |
| 94 | West Valley City, UT | 51.40 | 40 | 54 | 181 | 105 | 27 |
| 95 | Providence, RI | 51.33 | 105 | 23 | 51 | 117 | 154 |
| 96 | Cincinnati, OH | 51.26 | 10 | 115 | 138 | 62 | 166 |
| 97 | Vancouver, WA | 51.12 | 136 | 104 | 66 | 89 | 94 |
| 98 | Mesa, AZ | 50.84 | 97 | 84 | 160 | 104 | 31 |
| 99 | Tempe, AZ | 50.78 | 46 | 126 | 175 | 90 | 26 |
| 100 | Grand Rapids, MI | 50.76 | 162 | 103 | 139 | 44 | 112 |
| 101 | Arlington, TX | 50.75 | 72 | 99 | 149 | 99 | 59 |
| 102 | Anaheim, CA | 50.60 | 51 | 43 | 49 | 175 | 49 |
| 103 | Irving, TX | 50.56 | 172 | 76 | 146 | 86 | 10 |
| 104 | Nashville, TN | 49.55 | 125 | 164 | 129 | 53 | 64 |
| 105 | Garland, TX | 49.42 | 144 | 78 | 135 | 127 | 29 |
| 106 | Worcester, MA | 49.41 | 156 | 71 | 74 | 84 | 152 |
| 107 | Buffalo, NY | 49.34 | 98 | 111 | 82 | 50 | 175 |
| 108 | Tallahassee, FL | 49.31 | 122 | 125 | 97 | 67 | 141 |
| 109 | Jacksonville, FL | 49.20 | 94 | 128 | 132 | 76 | 111 |
| 110 | El Paso, TX | 49.18 | 20 | 94 | 104 | 155 | 124 |
| 111 | Bakersfield, CA | 49.17 | 26 | 127 | 143 | 123 | 99 |
| 112 | Fontana, CA | 49.11 | 35 | 74 | 107 | 168 | 41 |
| 113 | Fort Wayne, IN | 49.09 | 169 | 65 | 163 | 61 | 89 |
| 114 | Knoxville, TN | 49.09 | 127 | 107 | 89 | 93 | 132 |
| 115 | Cape Coral, FL | 49.00 | 171 | 41 | 134 | 135 | 53 |
| 116 | Oakland, CA | 49.00 | 140 | 138 | 32 | 108 | 138 |
| 117 | Louisville, KY | 48.68 | 148 | 105 | 152 | 57 | 119 |
| 118 | Brownsville, TX | 48.61 | 89 | 134 | 31 | 154 | 126 |
| 119 | Stockton, CA | 48.51 | 16 | 102 | 136 | 144 | 134 |
| 120 | Albuquerque, NM | 48.46 | 36 | 179 | 103 | 77 | 121 |
| 121 | Lubbock, TX | 48.44 | 111 | 154 | 65 | 96 | 115 |
| 122 | Salem, OR | 48.17 | 152 | 80 | 124 | 125 | 78 |
| 123 | Santa Ana, CA | 48.13 | 93 | 56 | 52 | 179 | 33 |
| 124 | Fresno, CA | 48.06 | 43 | 97 | 99 | 147 | 143 |
| 125 | Chattanooga, TN | 47.94 | 155 | 177 | 101 | 54 | 95 |
| 126 | Fort Smith, AR | 47.82 | 91 | 156 | 133 | 114 | 57 |
| 127 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 47.76 | 181 | 36 | 120 | 129 | 51 |
| 128 | Richmond, VA | 47.43 | 137 | 69 | 116 | 115 | 147 |
| 129 | Riverside, CA | 47.15 | 61 | 113 | 122 | 166 | 58 |
| 130 | Springfield, MO | 47.13 | 120 | 162 | 119 | 102 | 90 |
| 131 | Newport News, VA | 46.83 | 143 | 90 | 162 | 116 | 105 |
| 132 | Tacoma, WA | 46.81 | 175 | 178 | 80 | 64 | 104 |
| 133 | Rochester, NY | 46.80 | 126 | 131 | 45 | 75 | 179 |
| 134 | Oxnard, CA | 46.78 | 39 | 25 | 161 | 176 | 83 |
| 135 | Columbia, SC | 46.74 | 25 | 118 | 153 | 110 | 165 |
| 136 | Dallas, TX | 46.65 | 96 | 140 | 108 | 132 | 107 |
| 137 | Norfolk, VA | 46.60 | 119 | 55 | 150 | 140 | 130 |
| 138 | Glendale, AZ | 46.59 | 28 | 137 | 164 | 153 | 103 |
| 139 | Columbus, GA | 46.58 | 84 | 110 | 113 | 146 | 128 |
| 140 | Greensboro, NC | 46.57 | 109 | 152 | 88 | 106 | 145 |
| 141 | Wichita, KS | 46.25 | 168 | 153 | 140 | 79 | 68 |
| 142 | Huntington, WV | 46.16 | 112 | 86 | 174 | 120 | 137 |
| 143 | Philadelphia, PA | 46.15 | 12 | 121 | 142 | 134 | 170 |
| 144 | Houston, TX | 46.13 | 33 | 169 | 121 | 131 | 135 |
| 145 | New Haven, CT | 45.91 | 44 | 98 | 71 | 159 | 172 |
| 146 | Ontario, CA | 45.82 | 63 | 85 | 126 | 177 | 56 |
| 147 | Corpus Christi, TX | 45.60 | 160 | 130 | 130 | 119 | 84 |
| 148 | Moreno Valley, CA | 45.56 | 50 | 57 | 176 | 171 | 87 |
| 149 | North Las Vegas, NV | 45.51 | 53 | 52 | 182 | 150 | 139 |
| 150 | Tucson, AZ | 45.49 | 13 | 165 | 171 | 142 | 122 |
| 150 | Winston-Salem, NC | 45.49 | 104 | 141 | 156 | 121 | 114 |
| 152 | San Antonio, TX | 45.42 | 80 | 163 | 128 | 126 | 131 |
| 153 | Dover, DE | 45.38 | 174 | 95 | 117 | 122 | 144 |
| 154 | Milwaukee, WI | 45.09 | 41 | 142 | 148 | 124 | 164 |
| 155 | Aurora, CO | 45.06 | 167 | 157 | 113 | 83 | 125 |
| 156 | St. Louis, MO | 45.05 | 64 | 175 | 170 | 73 | 156 |
| 157 | Las Cruces, NM | 44.84 | 29 | 166 | 86 | 157 | 151 |
| 158 | Indianapolis, IN | 44.18 | 151 | 160 | 177 | 71 | 133 |
| 159 | Akron, OH | 44.08 | 133 | 79 | 169 | 109 | 176 |
| 160 | Baton Rouge, LA | 43.74 | 123 | 171 | 90 | 101 | 168 |
| 161 | Bridgeport, CT | 43.64 | 150 | 44 | 67 | 167 | 173 |
| 162 | Mobile, AL | 43.64 | 129 | 144 | 131 | 143 | 146 |
| 163 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 43.50 | 164 | 135 | 75 | 162 | 123 |
| 164 | Miami, FL | 43.21 | 65 | 91 | 36 | 181 | 155 |
| 165 | Montgomery, AL | 42.97 | 110 | 139 | 144 | 137 | 160 |
| 166 | Fayetteville, NC | 42.81 | 116 | 150 | 123 | 160 | 148 |
| 167 | Little Rock, AR | 42.17 | 158 | 182 | 94 | 87 | 108 |
| 168 | Wilmington, DE | 41.94 | 118 | 123 | 83 | 141 | 180 |
| 169 | Shreveport, LA | 41.79 | 131 | 161 | 93 | 152 | 162 |
| 170 | Augusta, GA | 41.30 | 128 | 167 | 98 | 149 | 161 |
| 171 | Toledo, OH | 41.28 | 78 | 149 | 178 | 136 | 171 |
| 172 | New Orleans, LA | 40.94 | 32 | 174 | 155 | 164 | 163 |
| 173 | Hialeah, FL | 39.78 | 176 | 40 | 59 | 182 | 149 |
| 174 | Jackson, MS | 39.57 | 76 | 180 | 127 | 161 | 167 |
| 175 | San Bernardino, CA | 39.26 | 22 | 168 | 172 | 178 | 136 |
| 176 | Baltimore, MD | 39.06 | 157 | 148 | 166 | 118 | 178 |
| 177 | Birmingham, AL | 38.23 | 124 | 170 | 167 | 148 | 174 |
| 178 | Newark, NJ | 38.07 | 170 | 88 | 53 | 180 | 177 |
| 179 | Gulfport, MS | 37.67 | 113 | 158 | 179 | 165 | 159 |
| 180 | Cleveland, OH | 34.89 | 100 | 172 | 173 | 163 | 181 |
| 181 | Detroit, MI | 34.10 | 49 | 173 | 180 | 156 | 182 |
| 182 | Memphis, TN | 34.07 | 153 | 181 | 168 | 158 | 169 |
Note: With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.

- Most
- T-1. Las Vegas, NV
- T-1. Chicago, IL
- T-1. New York, NY
- T-1. Cincinnati, OH
- 5. Houston, TX

- Fewest
- 99. Gilbert, AZ
- 100. Newark, NJ
- 101. North Las Vegas, NV
- 102. Port St. Lucie, FL
- 103. Hialeah, FL

- Most
- T-1. New York, NY
- T-1. Los Angeles, CA
- T-1. Chicago, IL
- T-1. Houston, TX
- T-1. San Diego, CA
- T-1. San Francisco, CA

- Fewest
- T-177. Moreno Valley, CA
- T-177. Lewiston, ME
- 179. West Valley City, UT
- 180. Fontana, CA
- 181. South Burlington, VT
- 182. Pearl City, HI

- Highest
- T-1. Columbia, MD
- T-1. Overland Park, KS
- T-1. Scottsdale, AZ
- 4. Fremont, CA
- 5. Gilbert, AZ

- Lowest
- 178. Cleveland, OH
- 179. New York, NY
- 180. Newark, NJ
- 181. Hialeah, FL
- 182. Detroit, MI

- Most
- 1. Cedar Rapids, IA
- 2. Bismarck, ND
- 3. Akron, OH
- 4. Fargo, ND
- 5. Wichita, KS

- Least
- 178. Long Beach, CA
- T-179. Los Angeles, CA
- T-179. Glendale, CA
- 181. Miami, FL
- 182. New York, NY

- Highest
- 1. Gilbert, AZ
- 2. Laredo, TX
- 3. Aurora, IL
- 4. Bakersfield, CA
- 5. Stockton, CA

- Lowest
- 178. St. Petersburg, FL
- 179. Honolulu, HI
- 180. Cape Coral, FL
- 181. Scottsdale, AZ
- 182. Pearl City, HI

- Lowest
- 1. Warwick, RI
- 2. Irvine, CA
- 3. Virginia Beach, VA
- 4. Port St. Lucie, FL
- 5. Gilbert, AZ

- Highest
- T-173. Memphis, TN
- T-173. Baltimore, MD
- T-173. Cleveland, OH
- T-173. Birmingham, AL
- T-173. Little Rock, AR
- T-173. Oakland, CA

- Lowest
- 1. Overland Park, KS
- 2. Gilbert, AZ
- T-3. Fremont, CA
- T-3. Warwick, RI
- 5. Pearl City, HI

- Highest
- 178. Buffalo, NY
- T-179. Rochester, NY
- T-179. Brownsville, TX
- 181. Cleveland, OH
- 182. Detroit, MI

- Lowest
- 1. Fremont, CA
- 2. Irvine, CA
- 3. Pearl City, HI
- 4. Gilbert, AZ
- 5. San Jose, CA

- Highest
- 178. Wilmington, DE
- 179. Rochester, NY
- 180. Birmingham, AL
- 181. Detroit, MI
- 182. Cleveland, OH
In-Depth Look at the Best Places to Raise a Family
Fremont, CA
Fremont, CA, is the best place to raise a family in 2025, due largely to economic factors. The city boasts one of the highest median family incomes after adjusting for the cost of living, at close to $130,000, and it has the third-lowest share of families living in poverty as well as the third-lowest share receiving food stamps. In addition, nearly 50% of families in Fremont have children under age 18, one of the highest rates in the country.
Fremont is especially good when it comes to children’s education, with a high percentage of public schools rated at least a 7 out of 10 (58.3%), and many summer camp opportunities per capita.
Fremont also is a city where residents are able to stay healthy. Only 1.6% of children lack health insurance, the fifth-lowest percentage in the country, and only 1.1% of the population lacks access to healthy food. The city also has the fifth-most parkland acres per capita, allowing for good outdoor exercise opportunities.
Overland Park, KS
Overland Park, KS, is the second-best place to raise a family in 2025. It has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country, at 3.4%, along with one of the highest median family incomes, at over $149,000 after adjusting for the cost of living. Overland Park has a very small percentage of families in poverty or receiving food stamps, too.
Another area where Overland Park stands out is that it has the second-highest percentage of two-parent families in the country, over 81%. It also has the 10th-lowest separation and divorce rate in the country.
To top things off, Overland Park is a good place for children to stay safe, with a low traffic fatality rate and the fifth-best public hospitals in the country.
Plano, TX
Plano, TX, is the third-best place to raise a family, and it has the tenth-lowest violent crime rate per capita as well as the 29th-lowest property crime rate per capita. This, combined with a low traffic fatality rate, can help children stay safe.
In addition, Plano is a great place to be in for children’s education. It has the ninth-highest percentage of schools with a 7+ out of 10 rating, at over 55%, along with the fifth-highest high school graduation rate.
Finally, Plano has the fourth-highest share of two parent families and the ninth-lowest separation and divorce rate in the country, both of which promote positive social development among children.
Ask the Experts
Raising a family is a tall order. And with so many important decisions to make, it’s often difficult to determine where to turn for help with family matters. We turned to experts in the fields of family studies, psychology and household finance for tips, insights and a few cautionary tales. Click on the experts’ profiles below to read their bios and thoughts on the following key questions:
- To what degree is child development and a family’s quality of life influenced by the city in which they live? How?
- What are some of the biggest points of concern for families nowadays?
- How can local officials make their cities more attractive to young families?
- What should families consider when choosing a place to settle down?
- What are the most important steps parents can take to help their children grow up healthy?
Ask the Experts
Ph.D. – Professor of Psychology - California State University, San Bernardino
Read More
Associate Professor of Population Health, Chair - Hofstra University
Read More
Ph.D., MSW - Professor and BSW Program Director, Raymond A. Kent School of Social Work and Family Science- University of Louisville
Read More
Ph.D. – Associate Professor of Human Development and Family Science – Texas Tech University - Texas Tech University
Read More
Ph.D. – Professor, Human Development and Family Studies, Community-University Partnership Director, Colorado State University Prevention Research Center – Colorado State University - College of Health and Human Sciences
Read More
Ph.D. – Dean, Azrieli Graduate School of Jewish Education and Administration, Raine & Stanley Silverstein Chair in Professional Ethics and Values – Yeshiva University
Read More
Methodology
In order to determine which cities are most conducive to family life, WalletHub compared 182 U.S. cities — including the 150 most populated U.S. cities, plus at least two of the most populated cities in each state — across five key dimensions: 1) Family Fun, 2) Health & Safety, 3) Education & Child Care, 4) Affordability and 5) Socio-economics.
We evaluated those categories using 45 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for family life. Data for metrics marked with an asterisk (*) were available at the state level only. For metrics marked with two asterisks (**), we calculated population size using the square root of the population in order to avoid overcompensating for minor differences across cities.
Finally, we determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order our sample. Our sample considers only the city proper in each case and excludes cities in the surrounding metro area.
Family Fun – Total Points: 20
- Playgrounds per Capita**: Full Weight (~1.11 Points)
- Ice Rinks per Capita**: Half Weight (~0.56 Points)
- Skate Parks per Capita**: Half Weight (~0.56 Points)
- Bike Rental Facilities per Capita**: Half Weight (~0.56 Points)
- Mini Golf Locations per Capita**: Half Weight (~0.56 Points)
- Parkland Acreage per Capita: Half Weight (~0.56 Points)
- Walkability: Full Weight (~1.11 Points)
- Bike Score: Full Weight (~1.11 Points)
- Number of Attractions: Full Weight (~1.11 Points)
Note: “Attractions” include, for instance, zoos, museums and theaters. - Recreation-Friendliness: Double Weight (~2.22 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Cities for Recreation” ranking. - Sports-Fan-Friendliness: Double Weight (~2.22 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best Sports Cities” ranking. - Ideal Weather: Quadruple Weight (~4.44 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Cities With the Best & Worst Weather” ranking. - Share of Families with Young Children: Triple Weight (~3.33 Points)
Note: “Young children” include the population aged 0 to 18. - Average Commute Time: Half Weight (~0.56 Points)
Health & Safety – Total Points: 20
- Air Quality: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
- Water Quality: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
- Limited Access to Healthy Foods: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
- Pediatricians per Capita: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
- Share of Uninsured Children: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
Note: “Children” include the population aged 0 to 18. - Public Hospitals Ranking*: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
- Infant Mortality Rate: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
- Pedestrian-Fatality Rate: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
- Driving Fatalities per Capita: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
- Violent-Crime Rate per Capita: Double Weight (~2.86 Points)
- Property-Crime Rate per Capita: Double Weight (~2.86 Points)
- Family Homelessness: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
Note: This metric measures the number of homeless people in families per total homeless population.
Education & Child Care – Total Points: 20
- School-System Quality: Double Weight (~6.15 Points)
Note: This metric is based on GreatSchools.org average score. - High School Graduation Rate: Half Weight (~1.54 Points)
- Child-Care Costs*: Half Weight (~1.54 Points)
Note: This metric was adjusted for the median family income. - Child Day-Care Services per Capita: Full Weight (~3.08 Points)
- Childcare Workers per Total Number of Children under 14 Years: Full Weight (~3.08 Points)
- Parental-Leave Policy Score*: Full Weight (~3.08 Points)
Note: This metric is based on the report card from Expecting Better: A State-by-State Analysis of Laws That Help Expecting and New Parents. - Summer Learning Opportunities per Capita**: Half Weight (~1.54 Points)
Affordability – Total Points: 20
- Cost of Living: Full Weight (~6.67 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated as follows: Median Annual Family Income / Cost-of-Living Index. - Housing Affordability: Full Weight (~6.67 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated as follows: Median Annual Family Income / Housing Costs (accounts for both rent and home-sales prices). - Wallet Wellness: Full Weight (~6.67 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Cities for Wallet Fitness” ranking.
Socio-economics – Total Points: 20
- Share of Two-Parent Families: Full Weight (~2.35 Points)
- Separation & Divorce Rate: Full Weight (~2.35 Points)
- Share of Families Living in Poverty: Full Weight (~2.35 Points)
- Share of Families Receiving Food Stamps: Full Weight (~2.35 Points)
- Unemployment Rate: Full Weight (~2.35 Points)
- Underemployment Rate: Full Weight (~2.35 Points)
- Debt per Median Earnings: Full Weight (~2.35 Points)
- Wealth Gap: Full Weight (~2.35 Points)
- Foreclosure Rate: Half Weight (~1.18 Points)
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected as of April 28, 2025 from the U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Environmental Protection Agency, County Health Rankings, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Council for Community and Economic Research, The Trust for Public Land, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, National Partnership for Women & Families, TripAdvisor, Walk Score, Chmura Economics & Analytics, TransUnion, Yelp, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, GreatSchools.org, Numbeo, ATTOM, a property data provider - U.S. Foreclosure Market Report and WalletHub research.








WalletHub experts are widely quoted. Contact our media team to schedule an interview.