Best & Worst Cities for Recreation (2025)

Adam McCann, WalletHub Financial WriterJul 14, 2025

Adam McCann, WalletHub Financial Writer
Jul 14, 2025

Staying active isn’t just good for your health. It’s also good for your wallet. One of the best ways to maintain an active lifestyle is to choose a city that encourages and facilitates recreation. The best cities have a wide range of leisure activities, both indoor and outdoor. Those activities require varying levels of exercise and contribute to a city’s overall well-being and economy.

Neighborhood parks are one of the most beneficial types of recreation a city can offer. Research has found that having a park within 500 to 600 feet of your property can have a significant impact on its value. In addition, parks help people stay fit, saving them nearly $1,900 in healthcare costs per year, and they reduce the overall costs of air pollution by $3.8 billion per year. It’s also important for cities to offer recreation opportunities that don’t require good weather, though. Therefore, places like movie theaters, music venues and coffee shops contribute to each city’s recreation-friendliness, too.

Some cities offer cheaper and more numerous options than others. To determine the places where recreation is a high priority, WalletHub compared the 100 largest U.S. cities across 47 key metrics that speak to the benefits of recreational activities. In each city, we examined basic living costs, the quality of parks, the accessibility of entertainment and recreational facilities and the weather.

“Recreation is an important factor to consider when moving to a new city. Without adequate space for activities you enjoy, your mental health will suffer. In addition, a lack of green spaces or indoor places to exercise can make it hard to stay fit and take care of your physical health. The best cities for recreation have a wide variety of indoor and outdoor activities that can help people of all ages stay entertained and active.”

Chip Lupo, WalletHub Analyst

Table of Contents

Main Findings

Embed on your website

Best Cities for Recreation

Overall Rank	City	Total Score	Entertainment & Recreational Facilities Rank	Costs Rank	Quality of Parks Rank	Weather Rank
1	Las Vegas, NV	67.95	1	21	22	18
2	Cincinnati, OH	61.66	13	2	7	58
3	Orlando, FL	61.10	2	52	57	28
4	Atlanta, GA	59.69	6	61	23	41
5	Tampa, FL	59.20	11	49	69	13
6	San Diego, CA	57.05	4	85	35	34
7	Scottsdale, AZ	57.05	31	39	24	3
8	Los Angeles, CA	55.62	5	90	70	7
9	St. Louis, MO	55.10	15	8	18	94
10	Honolulu, HI	54.66	8	92	8	43
11	San Francisco, CA	54.64	3	95	5	49
12	Phoenix, AZ	54.18	25	46	64	17
13	Tucson, AZ	53.64	32	19	74	16
14	Chicago, IL	53.12	7	78	10	92
15	Albuquerque, NM	52.30	44	26	26	37
16	Sacramento, CA	52.09	34	81	12	9
17	El Paso, TX	52.05	61	3	41	25
18	Houston, TX	51.99	20	38	25	86
19	Portland, OR	51.82	16	66	13	78
20	St. Petersburg, FL	51.66	33	27	54	40
21	Denver, CO	51.50	14	79	15	64
22	New Orleans, LA	51.35	18	77	17	53
23	Irvine, CA	50.68	57	75	1	21
24	Pittsburgh, PA	50.61	21	35	45	84
25	Tulsa, OK	50.58	49	12	66	30
26	Milwaukee, WI	50.44	28	14	19	95
27	Austin, TX	50.02	19	42	72	81
28	Henderson, NV	49.97	73	7	84	4
29	Glendale, AZ	49.76	70	9	81	11
30	Minneapolis, MN	49.69	29	53	11	77
31	North Las Vegas, NV	49.49	90	1	44	5
32	Boise, ID	49.49	56	32	48	26
33	St. Paul, MN	49.13	35	20	27	69
34	Birmingham, AL	48.90	47	22	N/A	59
35	San Antonio, TX	48.76	24	16	82	74
36	Lincoln, NE	48.61	64	37	20	46
37	Philadelphia, PA	48.58	22	83	40	52
38	New York, NY	48.15	9	100	6	55
39	Kansas City, MO	47.67	53	41	51	44
40	Long Beach, CA	47.46	43	82	47	12
41	Fort Worth, TX	47.41	68	33	46	32
42	Dallas, TX	47.29	27	69	28	72
43	San Bernardino, CA	47.21	96	54	N/A	8
44	Cleveland, OH	47.18	37	10	56	83
45	Jacksonville, FL	46.93	30	65	38	67
46	Louisville, KY	46.90	26	31	76	91
47	Baton Rouge, LA	46.87	40	36	73	54
48	Plano, TX	46.71	62	56	39	45
49	Chandler, AZ	46.68	88	43	53	14
50	Reno, NV	46.61	50	50	89	27
51	Oklahoma City, OK	46.32	60	17	91	35
52	Seattle, WA	46.18	17	91	29	70
53	Omaha, NE	46.17	39	48	33	75
54	Bakersfield, CA	46.06	85	34	92	2
55	Mesa, AZ	46.05	72	44	75	20
56	Norfolk, VA	46.03	54	62	14	62
57	Riverside, CA	45.92	69	51	98	1
58	Miami, FL	45.75	10	96	58	68
59	Chesapeake, VA	45.68	95	57	3	47
60	Washington, DC	45.65	12	97	16	93
61	Columbus, OH	45.43	51	58	31	61
62	Arlington, TX	45.40	67	68	42	36
63	Madison, WI	45.29	46	76	2	73
64	Garland, TX	45.26	93	4	94	33
65	Colorado Springs, CO	45.10	59	64	60	42
66	Stockton, CA	44.95	92	67	49	10
67	Winston-Salem, NC	44.88	83	29	79	39
68	Detroit, MI	44.44	74	23	37	60
69	Buffalo, NY	44.27	38	60	32	100
70	Toledo, OH	44.12	86	15	52	50
71	Nashville, TN	44.10	36	59	59	88
72	Santa Ana, CA	43.84	77	72	67	21
73	Anaheim, CA	43.69	52	89	87	6
74	Lubbock, TX	43.14	89	11	86	48
75	Virginia Beach, VA	43.06	42	70	36	90
76	Corpus Christi, TX	42.95	71	18	61	66
77	Greensboro, NC	42.66	87	5	71	57
78	Gilbert, AZ	42.49	94	40	96	14
79	Laredo, TX	42.42	100	25	88	31
80	Boston, MA	41.98	23	98	9	98
81	Memphis, TN	41.81	66	28	68	87
82	Raleigh, NC	41.80	55	45	85	79
83	Charlotte, NC	41.32	45	71	77	71
84	Anchorage, AK	41.08	58	87	4	82
85	Aurora, CO	40.97	84	30	62	65
86	Lexington-Fayette, KY	40.93	76	55	63	62
87	Fremont, CA	40.77	98	86	21	24
88	Indianapolis, IN	40.46	48	24	95	99
89	Baltimore, MD	40.01	41	80	55	89
90	San Jose, CA	39.82	65	99	30	23
91	Wichita, KS	39.19	78	13	93	85
92	Fort Wayne, IN	39.08	75	6	90	96
93	Fresno, CA	38.51	91	84	83	19
94	Oakland, CA	38.01	63	93	34	51
95	Hialeah, FL	37.70	81	88	78	38
96	Chula Vista, CA	37.36	99	73	80	29
97	Irving, TX	36.32	97	63	65	76
98	Durham, NC	36.11	79	47	97	79
99	Newark, NJ	35.79	80	74	43	97
100	Jersey City, NJ	34.62	82	94	50	55

Note: With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.

Bowling Costs

Lowest

Lowest
1. Milwaukee, WI
T-2. Oklahoma City, OK
T-2. Raleigh, NC
4. El Paso, TX
5. Toledo, OH

Highest

Highest
96. Boston, MA
T-97. New York, NY
T-97. Jersey City, NJ
T-99. San Jose, CA
T-99. Fremont, CA

Movie Costs

Lowest

Lowest
1. Corpus Christi, TX
2. Lubbock, TX
T-3. Phoenix, AZ
T-3. Mesa, AZ
T-3. Chandler, AZ

Highest

Highest
96. Chicago, IL
97. Honolulu, HI
98. New York, NY
T-99. Los Angeles, CA
T-99. Long Beach, CA

Avg. Food Price

Lowest

Lowest
1. Austin, TX
T-2. Las Vegas, NV
T-2. Henderson, NV
T-2. North Las Vegas, NV
5. Charlotte, NC

Highest

Highest
96. Sacramento, CA
97. Baltimore, MD
98. Oakland, CA
99. Fremont, CA
100. San Francisco, CA

Tennis Courts per Capita

Most

Most
T-1. Honolulu, HI
T-1. Norfolk, VA
3. Omaha, NE
4. Atlanta, GA
5. Washington, DC

Fewest

Fewest
94. Fort Worth, TX
95. Gilbert, AZ
96. Riverside, CA
97. Irving, TX
98. Mesa, AZ

Coffee Shops per Capita

Most

Most
T-1. Pittsburgh, PA
T-1. Cincinnati, OH
T-1. Orlando, FL
T-1. St. Louis, MO
T-1. Honolulu, HI

Fewest

Fewest
96. San Bernardino, CA
97. Hialeah, FL
98. Los Angeles, CA
99. Laredo, TX
100. New York, NY

Music Venues per Capita

Most

Most
T-1. Las Vegas, NV
T-1. Nashville, TN
T-1. New Orleans, LA
T-1. San Francisco, CA
T-1. Austin, TX

Fewest

Fewest
95. Irving, TX
96. Laredo, TX
97. Stockton, CA
98. Fremont, CA
99. Garland, TX

% of Parkland

Highest

Highest
T-1. Anchorage, AK
T-1. Fremont, CA
T-1. Scottsdale, AZ
4. Chesapeake, VA
5. Irvine, CA

Lowest

Lowest
94. Laredo, TX
95. Lexington-Fayette, KY
96. Baton Rouge, LA
97. Fresno, CA
98. Hialeah, FL

In-Depth Look at the Best Cities for Recreation

Las Vegas, NV

Las Vegas is the best city for recreation, and not just because of its famous casinos. It also has an extremely high number of attractions overall, ranking at the top of the country when it comes to the number of music venues, amusement parks, zoos and aquariums per capita.

In addition, Las Vegas is a great city for staying active, boasting a very high number of basketball hoops, hiking trails, bowling alleys, sport venues and park playgrounds per capita. This creates opportunities for people of all ages to pursue fitness while having fun.

Finally, Las Vegas has plenty of good places to eat, as it’s one of the best cities for the availability of affordable restaurants with 4.5+ stars. It ranks among the top cities when it comes to the number of food festivals, food tours and ice cream shops per capita. And despite what you might expect, food and beverage prices in Las Vegas are lower than average. It’s even one of the cheapest cities for burgers.

Cincinnati, OH

Cincinnati, OH, is the second-best city for recreation, and as an inland city, it excels in land-based recreational activities, ranking highly for its number of public and municipal golf courses per capita, as well as facilities for baseball and softball diamonds per capita, and bowling centers per capita. Cincinnati is also home to the 7th-highest number of baseball fans in the country, reflecting its deep-rooted passion for the sport.

Cincinnati’s seasonal climate makes it ideal for outdoor recreation, especially in the fall and spring. It ranks high nationally for amusement parks and playgrounds per capita, offering plenty of options for families and outdoor enthusiasts alike.

Finally, Cincinnati has the 2nd-most coffee & tea shops per capita overall, and when it comes to affordable restaurants with at least 4.5 stars, it’s one of the top cities. It also has a very high number of public swimming pools and ice cream shops.

Orlando, FL

Orlando, FL, is the third-best city for recreation, due in large part to its amusement parks such as Disney World and Universal Studios. In addition, Orlando has a very high number of water parks, boat tours, water sports opportunities, zoos, aquariums and pool halls per capita.

There are also a lot of great places for outdoor activities in Orlando. It ranks at the top of the country for sport venues per capita and 13th for the availability of recreational centers. Orlando also has the 11th-highest percentage of city land that is designated as parkland, giving people plenty of space to choose their own types of recreation. Orlando is the fourth-best city for soccer fans, too.

When it comes to dining, Orlando has an especially high number of restaurants per capita, and it’s one of the best cities for affordable restaurants rated at least 4.5 stars. It also has a large number of ice cream and frozen yogurt shops per capita, along with the 8th-most food festivals.

Ask the Experts

Public facilities are known to enhance public health, a city’s economy and the beauty of a community — but only when planned and managed carefully. We therefore turned to a panel of experts for advice on improving municipal parks and recreation options. Click on the experts’ profiles below to read their bios and responses to the following key questions:

What are some cost-effective ways for local authorities to improve parks and recreation facilities?
What is the biggest mistake local authorities make in building and maintaining parks and recreation facilities?
Should local authorities prioritize funding recreational activities for certain groups (e.g., the elderly or children)?
When evaluating the best cities for recreation, what are the top five indicators?
Do you think cities should consider raising new taxes or increasing debt levels in order to invest in parks and recreation?

Ask the Experts

Kenneth A. Cohen
Ph.D. – Associate Professor and Chair, Recreation, Parks and Leisure Studies Department - SUNY Cortland
Read More

Randall S. Rosenberger
Ph.D., Professor of Applied Economics, Forest Ecosystems & Society Department - Oregon State University | College of Forestry
Read More

Heather Burket
Ed.M., CTRS, CCLS - Instructor and Level I Fieldwork Coordinator, Recreation Therapy Program, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Public Health - Temple University
Read More

Matthew Frye
M.S., CTRS/L – Clinical Associate Professor, Therapeutic Recreation Option Coordinator, Department of Recreation Management & Policy – University of New Hampshire
Read More

J. Aaron Hipp
Ph.D. – Associate Director, Center for Geospatial Analytics; Professor, Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, College of Natural Resources – North Carolina State University
Read More

Lauren Duffy
Associate Professor and Undergraduate Coordinator, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, Faculty Senate President – Clemson University
Read More

Methodology

To determine the best and worst cities for recreation, WalletHub compared a sample of the 100 most populated U.S. cities across four key dimensions: 1) Entertainment & Recreational Facilities, 2) Costs, 3) Quality of Parks and 4) Weather. Our sample considers only the city proper in each case and excludes cities in the surrounding metro area.

We evaluated the four dimensions using 47 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the highest level of recreation-friendliness. For metrics marked with an asterisk (*), the square root of the population was used to calculate the population size in order to avoid overcompensating for minor differences across cities.

Finally, we determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order our sample.

Entertainment & Recreational Facilities – Total Points: 40

Number of Attractions: Double Weight (~2.62 Points)
Music Venues per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Coffee & Tea Shops per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Public Beaches per Capita*: Half Weight (~0.66 Points)
Tennis Courts per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Public & Municipal Golf Courses per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Public Swimming Pools per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Baseball & Softball Diamonds per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Basketball Hoops per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Bike Rental Facilities per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Bike Score: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Walk Score: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Hiking Trails per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Fishing Spots per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Amusement Parks per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Presence on TripAdvisor’s “Top 25 Amusement & Water Parks” List: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Boat Tours & Water Sports per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Water Parks per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Food & Wine Tours per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Zoos & Aquariums per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Motion Picture Theaters and Drive-Ins per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Bowling Centers per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Pool Halls per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Restaurants per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Food Festivals per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Ice Cream & Frozen Yogurt Shops per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Sports Fan-Friendliness: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best Sports Cities” ranking. Sports include football, basketball, baseball, hockey and soccer.
Intramural Leagues per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Sport Venues per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)
Recreational Centers per Capita*: Full Weight (~1.31 Points)

Costs – Total Points: 30

Spending on Parks and Recreation per Capita: Half Weight (~1.30 Points)
Average Fitness Club Fee: Full Weight (~2.61 Points)
Average Cost of Tennis-Court Rent: Full Weight (~2.61 Points)
Note: This metric considers the cost of rent for one hour during the weekend.
Movie Costs: Full Weight (~2.61 Points)
Bowling Costs: Full Weight (~2.61 Points)
Grooming Costs: Full Weight (~2.61 Points)
Average Price per Massage Treatment: Full Weight (~2.61 Points)
Note: Massage Treatment refers to both deep tissue and Swedish massage.
Average Alcoholic Beverage Price: Full Weight (~2.61 Points)
Note: “Alcoholic Beverage” refers to both beer and wine. “Beer” refers to a six-pack of 12-ounce Heineken containers, excluding any deposit. “Wine” refers to a 1.5-liter bottle of Chablis, Chenin Blanc or any white table wine.
Average Food Price: Full Weight (~2.61 Points)
Note: “Food” refers to both hamburger and pizza. “Hamburger” refers to a ¼-pound patty with cheese, pickle, onion, mustard, and ketchup. “Pizza” refers to an 11"-12" thin crust cheese pizza.
Prevalence of Affordable 4.5+ Star Restaurants: Full Weight (~2.61 Points)
Restaurant Meal Costs: Double Weight (~5.22 Points)

Quality of Parks – Total Points: 20

Share of Population with Walkable Park Access: Full Weight (~4.00 Points)
Share of Designed Parkland Areas: Full Weight (~4.00 Points)
Park Playgrounds per Capita*: Full Weight (~4.00 Points)
Parkland as Share of City Area: Full Weight (~4.00 Points)
Acres of Parkland per 1,000 Residents: Full Weight (~4.00 Points)

Weather – Total Points: 10

Ideal Weather (~10.00 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Cities with the Best & Worst Weather” ranking.

Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected as of June 16, 2025 from the U.S. Census Bureau, Council for Community and Economic Research, The Trust for Public Land, Yelp.com, TripAdvisor, Numbeo.com, Areavibes, 2Book, Walk Score, GolfLink, IMLeagues and WalletHub research.

Supporting Video Files:

Questions & Answers

Editorial and user-generated content on this page is not reviewed or otherwise endorsed by any financial institution. Please keep in mind that it is not a financial institution’s responsibility to ensure all posts and questions are answered.

Was this article helpful?

Expert Commentary

WalletHub experts are widely quoted. Contact our media team to schedule an interview.

Important Disclosures

Ad Disclosure: Certain offers that appear on this site originate from paying advertisers. For full transparency, here is a list of our current advertisers.

Advertising impacts how and where offers appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear and their prevalence). At WalletHub we try to present a wide array of offers, but our offers do not represent all financial services companies or products.

Advertising enables WalletHub to provide you proprietary tools, services, and content at no charge. Advertising does not impact WalletHub's editorial content including our best picks, reviews, ratings and opinions. Those are completely independent and not provided, commissioned, or endorsed by any company, as our editors follow a strict editorial policy.

WalletHub is not a financial advisor. Our goal is to provide you with top-notch content, data, and tools. You are responsible for deciding what financial products and providers are best for your needs.

Irrespective of whether an institution or professional is a paid advertiser, the presence of information on WalletHub does not constitute a referral or endorsement of the institution or professional by us or vice versa.

We work hard to show you up-to-date product terms, however, this information does not originate from us and thus, we do not guarantee its accuracy. Actual terms may vary. Before submitting an application, always verify all terms and conditions with the offering institution. Please let us know if you notice any differences.