Deciding where to lay the foundation for a long and prosperous career can be a tall order, especially for recent graduates entering the job market for the first time. After all, there are many factors — job-market saturation, housing affordability and commuter-friendliness, for instance — to consider about each prospective area. Fortunately, 69% of employers in the U.S. report difficulty finding qualified talent, indicating persistent labor shortages in 2026, which could benefit new graduates with in‑demand skills.
To help recent college graduates find the best cradles for their budding careers, WalletHub compared the relative market strength and overall livability of more than 180 U.S. cities. We examined each city based on 25 key metrics that range from the availability of entry-level jobs to the average monthly starting salary to housing affordability.

Chip Lupo, WalletHub Analyst
Main Findings
Best Cities to Start a Career
| Overall Rank | City | Total Score | Professional Opportunities Rank | Quality of Life Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Atlanta, GA | 71.33 | 2 | 3 |
| 2 | Orlando, FL | 70.28 | 3 | 8 |
| 3 | Austin, TX | 67.37 | 10 | 1 |
| 4 | Tampa, FL | 67.10 | 4 | 17 |
| 5 | Miami, FL | 65.92 | 1 | 74 |
| 6 | Charleston, SC | 64.12 | 7 | 19 |
| 7 | Pittsburgh, PA | 62.73 | 14 | 10 |
| 8 | Knoxville, TN | 61.82 | 5 | 75 |
| 9 | Salt Lake City, UT | 61.66 | 22 | 7 |
| 10 | Columbia, SC | 61.16 | 12 | 21 |
| 11 | South Burlington, VT | 59.30 | 18 | 27 |
| 12 | Dallas, TX | 59.06 | 11 | 69 |
| 13 | Richmond, VA | 58.82 | 15 | 50 |
| 14 | St. Louis, MO | 58.58 | 16 | 56 |
| 15 | Wilmington, DE | 58.47 | 13 | 66 |
| 16 | Grand Rapids, MI | 58.38 | 17 | 44 |
| 17 | Chattanooga, TN | 58.17 | 9 | 89 |
| 18 | Raleigh, NC | 57.91 | 34 | 15 |
| 19 | Las Vegas, NV | 57.90 | 20 | 36 |
| 20 | Birmingham, AL | 57.62 | 8 | 121 |
| 21 | Denver, CO | 57.62 | 52 | 6 |
| 22 | Minneapolis, MN | 57.58 | 53 | 5 |
| 23 | Scottsdale, AZ | 57.31 | 37 | 16 |
| 24 | Portland, ME | 56.75 | 38 | 18 |
| 25 | Nashville, TN | 56.68 | 26 | 45 |
| 26 | Tempe, AZ | 56.64 | 69 | 4 |
| 27 | Washington, DC | 56.47 | 47 | 13 |
| 28 | Huntsville, AL | 56.33 | 28 | 42 |
| 29 | Charlotte, NC | 55.59 | 31 | 51 |
| 30 | Dover, DE | 55.57 | 6 | 177 |
| 31 | Phoenix, AZ | 55.51 | 35 | 40 |
| 32 | Plano, TX | 55.48 | 40 | 25 |
| 33 | Bismarck, ND | 55.46 | 32 | 47 |
| 34 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 55.35 | 21 | 77 |
| 35 | Boston, MA | 55.13 | 41 | 26 |
| 36 | Rochester, NY | 54.71 | 27 | 76 |
| 37 | Cincinnati, OH | 54.52 | 42 | 38 |
| 38 | Burlington, VT | 54.50 | 48 | 31 |
| 39 | Chandler, AZ | 54.27 | 59 | 23 |
| 40 | Cleveland, OH | 54.00 | 23 | 113 |
| 41 | Charleston, WV | 53.81 | 29 | 83 |
| 42 | Irving, TX | 53.60 | 30 | 91 |
| 43 | Seattle, WA | 53.59 | 129 | 2 |
| 44 | Sacramento, CA | 53.56 | 49 | 43 |
| 44 | Rapid City, SD | 53.56 | 44 | 52 |
| 46 | Reno, NV | 53.54 | 60 | 32 |
| 47 | Springfield, MO | 53.17 | 33 | 90 |
| 48 | Manchester, NH | 53.14 | 25 | 112 |
| 49 | Kansas City, MO | 53.14 | 45 | 62 |
| 50 | Irvine, CA | 53.09 | 58 | 39 |
| 51 | Houston, TX | 53.08 | 51 | 48 |
| 52 | Columbus, OH | 52.73 | 62 | 37 |
| 53 | Indianapolis, IN | 52.45 | 36 | 100 |
| 54 | Durham, NC | 52.36 | 57 | 58 |
| 55 | Overland Park, KS | 52.28 | 93 | 20 |
| 56 | Jacksonville, FL | 52.06 | 39 | 94 |
| 57 | San Francisco, CA | 51.95 | 117 | 11 |
| 58 | Omaha, NE | 51.89 | 80 | 34 |
| 59 | Lewiston, ME | 51.80 | 19 | 161 |
| 60 | San Diego, CA | 51.75 | 85 | 28 |
| 61 | Boise, ID | 51.60 | 123 | 14 |
| 62 | Huntington, WV | 51.51 | 24 | 139 |
| 63 | St. Petersburg, FL | 51.48 | 65 | 59 |
| 64 | Fort Worth, TX | 51.21 | 54 | 80 |
| 65 | Spokane, WA | 51.16 | 67 | 65 |
| 66 | Des Moines, IA | 50.92 | 74 | 60 |
| 67 | Sioux Falls, SD | 50.85 | 103 | 30 |
| 68 | Columbia, MD | 50.66 | 113 | 29 |
| 69 | Providence, RI | 50.66 | 64 | 71 |
| 70 | Tulsa, OK | 50.63 | 66 | 70 |
| 71 | Nashua, NH | 50.51 | 50 | 101 |
| 72 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 50.46 | 55 | 92 |
| 73 | Amarillo, TX | 50.44 | 43 | 118 |
| 74 | Billings, MT | 50.41 | 84 | 57 |
| 75 | Madison, WI | 50.22 | 138 | 12 |
| 76 | Oklahoma City, OK | 50.05 | 88 | 49 |
| 77 | Colorado Springs, CO | 50.04 | 114 | 33 |
| 78 | Missoula, MT | 49.64 | 97 | 54 |
| 79 | Mesa, AZ | 49.50 | 76 | 78 |
| 80 | Gilbert, AZ | 49.43 | 87 | 67 |
| 81 | Portland, OR | 49.27 | 152 | 9 |
| 82 | Chicago, IL | 49.27 | 105 | 53 |
| 83 | Nampa, ID | 49.20 | 73 | 88 |
| 84 | Fayetteville, NC | 48.62 | 72 | 105 |
| 85 | San Antonio, TX | 48.57 | 94 | 72 |
| 86 | Cheyenne, WY | 48.28 | 83 | 96 |
| 87 | Henderson, NV | 48.15 | 122 | 63 |
| 88 | Augusta, GA | 48.08 | 46 | 147 |
| 89 | Juneau, AK | 48.08 | 80 | 102 |
| 90 | Warwick, RI | 48.07 | 71 | 117 |
| 91 | Casper, WY | 48.02 | 92 | 86 |
| 92 | Albuquerque, NM | 47.97 | 101 | 81 |
| 93 | Worcester, MA | 47.68 | 79 | 114 |
| 94 | Wichita, KS | 47.54 | 90 | 103 |
| 95 | Vancouver, WA | 47.54 | 94 | 93 |
| 96 | Glendale, AZ | 47.49 | 70 | 125 |
| 97 | Norfolk, VA | 47.47 | 108 | 85 |
| 98 | Greensboro, NC | 47.46 | 75 | 124 |
| 99 | West Valley City, UT | 47.28 | 115 | 82 |
| 100 | Baltimore, MD | 47.19 | 68 | 141 |
| 101 | Tucson, AZ | 47.17 | 125 | 73 |
| 102 | Lubbock, TX | 46.90 | 102 | 108 |
| 103 | Louisville, KY | 46.84 | 106 | 104 |
| 104 | Arlington, TX | 46.77 | 99 | 111 |
| 105 | Mobile, AL | 46.70 | 56 | 159 |
| 106 | Tallahassee, FL | 46.56 | 143 | 55 |
| 107 | Fargo, ND | 46.36 | 171 | 24 |
| 108 | Jersey City, NJ | 46.07 | 154 | 41 |
| 109 | Buffalo, NY | 46.01 | 130 | 87 |
| 110 | Gulfport, MS | 45.94 | 61 | 165 |
| 111 | Corpus Christi, TX | 45.77 | 118 | 116 |
| 112 | Fort Smith, AR | 45.72 | 77 | 144 |
| 113 | Virginia Beach, VA | 45.69 | 146 | 61 |
| 114 | Milwaukee, WI | 45.67 | 121 | 115 |
| 115 | Fort Wayne, IN | 45.54 | 91 | 134 |
| 116 | North Las Vegas, NV | 45.51 | 126 | 109 |
| 117 | St. Paul, MN | 45.47 | 177 | 22 |
| 118 | Anchorage, AK | 45.41 | 160 | 46 |
| 119 | Lincoln, NE | 45.37 | 172 | 35 |
| 120 | Honolulu, HI | 45.24 | 149 | 68 |
| 121 | Aurora, CO | 45.18 | 131 | 106 |
| 122 | San Jose, CA | 45.07 | 132 | 99 |
| 123 | Los Angeles, CA | 44.90 | 127 | 120 |
| 124 | Huntington Beach, CA | 44.88 | 133 | 98 |
| 125 | Baton Rouge, LA | 44.75 | 111 | 137 |
| 126 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 44.68 | 161 | 64 |
| 127 | Columbus, GA | 44.67 | 86 | 152 |
| 128 | Oceanside, CA | 44.63 | 100 | 143 |
| 129 | Grand Prairie, TX | 44.62 | 110 | 136 |
| 130 | Fontana, CA | 44.38 | 98 | 146 |
| 131 | Newport News, VA | 44.28 | 96 | 151 |
| 132 | Aurora, IL | 44.15 | 119 | 131 |
| 133 | Modesto, CA | 44.07 | 112 | 145 |
| 134 | Winston-Salem, NC | 43.98 | 124 | 132 |
| 135 | Moreno Valley, CA | 43.97 | 78 | 174 |
| 136 | Stockton, CA | 43.87 | 89 | 168 |
| 137 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 43.54 | 116 | 150 |
| 138 | Little Rock, AR | 43.52 | 109 | 157 |
| 139 | Fremont, CA | 43.51 | 159 | 84 |
| 140 | San Bernardino, CA | 43.49 | 104 | 166 |
| 141 | Hialeah, FL | 43.35 | 63 | 182 |
| 142 | Akron, OH | 43.31 | 128 | 135 |
| 143 | New Orleans, LA | 43.19 | 134 | 126 |
| 144 | Peoria, AZ | 42.97 | 141 | 122 |
| 145 | Chesapeake, VA | 42.89 | 155 | 107 |
| 146 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 42.84 | 135 | 129 |
| 147 | Salem, OR | 42.82 | 151 | 119 |
| 148 | Philadelphia, PA | 42.79 | 140 | 128 |
| 149 | Ontario, CA | 42.73 | 107 | 170 |
| 150 | Brownsville, TX | 42.64 | 120 | 164 |
| 151 | Newark, NJ | 42.48 | 82 | 180 |
| 152 | Oakland, CA | 42.41 | 175 | 79 |
| 153 | Garden Grove, CA | 42.41 | 142 | 127 |
| 154 | Glendale, CA | 42.27 | 139 | 138 |
| 155 | El Paso, TX | 42.18 | 164 | 110 |
| 156 | Tacoma, WA | 42.17 | 174 | 97 |
| 157 | Riverside, CA | 42.13 | 136 | 148 |
| 158 | Las Cruces, NM | 41.72 | 176 | 95 |
| 159 | Santa Ana, CA | 41.57 | 137 | 155 |
| 160 | Cape Coral, FL | 40.78 | 170 | 123 |
| 161 | Montgomery, AL | 40.64 | 144 | 156 |
| 162 | Fresno, CA | 40.59 | 145 | 160 |
| 163 | Memphis, TN | 40.51 | 148 | 163 |
| 164 | Garland, TX | 40.42 | 156 | 149 |
| 165 | Toledo, OH | 40.30 | 150 | 162 |
| 166 | Laredo, TX | 40.15 | 169 | 133 |
| 167 | New Haven, CT | 40.10 | 167 | 142 |
| 168 | Long Beach, CA | 40.06 | 157 | 153 |
| 169 | Santa Rosa, CA | 39.42 | 165 | 154 |
| 170 | Santa Clarita, CA | 39.36 | 153 | 167 |
| 171 | Bakersfield, CA | 38.94 | 180 | 130 |
| 172 | Yonkers, NY | 38.78 | 158 | 171 |
| 173 | Anaheim, CA | 38.66 | 166 | 169 |
| 174 | Jackson, MS | 38.12 | 163 | 175 |
| 175 | Shreveport, LA | 38.05 | 162 | 176 |
| 176 | Pearl City, HI | 38.02 | 181 | 140 |
| 177 | Oxnard, CA | 37.88 | 147 | 179 |
| 178 | Chula Vista, CA | 37.86 | 178 | 158 |
| 179 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 37.23 | 168 | 178 |
| 180 | Detroit, MI | 37.17 | 179 | 172 |
| 181 | Bridgeport, CT | 35.79 | 173 | 181 |
| 182 | New York, NY | 34.67 | 182 | 173 |
Note: With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.

- Highest
- 1. Austin, TX
- 2. Washington, DC
- 3. Oakland, CA
- 4. Houston, TX
- T-5. Baltimore, MD
- T-5. Columbia, MD

- Lowest
- 178. Rancho Cucamonga, CA
- 179. Anchorage, AK
- T-180. Honolulu, HI
- T-180. Pearl City, HI
- T-180. Juneau, AK

- Most
- T-1. Orlando, FL
- T-1. Atlanta, GA
- T-1. St. Louis, MO
- T-1. Richmond, VA
- T-1. Columbia, SC

- Fewest
- 178. Moreno Valley, CA
- 179. Garden Grove, CA
- 180. North Las Vegas, NV
- 181. Jersey City, NJ
- 182. Santa Clarita, CA

- Fastest
- 1. Moreno Valley, CA
- 2. Dover, DE
- 3. Lewiston, ME
- 4. Springfield, MO
- 5. Knoxville, TN

- Slowest
- 178. Fort Lauderdale, FL
- 179. Boise, ID
- 180. Baton Rouge, LA
- 181. Charleston, WV
- 182. Pearl City, HI

- Most
- 1. Cedar Rapids, IA
- 2. Wichita, KS
- 3. Des Moines, IA
- 4. Bismarck, ND
- 5. Akron, OH

- Least
- 178. Long Beach, CA
- 179. Miami, FL
- T-180. Los Angeles, CA
- T-180. Glendale, CA
- 182. New York, NY

- Highest
- 1. Seattle, WA
- 2. Jersey City, NJ
- 3. Denver, CO
- 4. Boston, MA
- 5. Austin, TX

- Lowest
- T-177. Santa Clarita, CA
- T-177. Pearl City, HI
- 179. Peoria, AZ
- 180. Pembroke Pines, FL
- 181. Cape Coral, FL
- 182. Port St. Lucie, FL
In-Depth Look at the Best Places to Start a Career
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta is the best place to start a career, with strong job growth of nearly 2.1% annually, ranking 10th in the nation. The median annual household income in Atlanta is pretty high as well, at over $90,400.
In addition, Atlanta has a lot of job opportunities at companies that are rated at least 4 out of 5 stars on Glassdoor, along with plentiful entry-level jobs, and people have a high rate of satisfaction with their jobs.
For people who want to not only start a career but also start their own business, Atlanta ranks as the 12th-best large city. It also ranks fourth among the most fun cities and it's the best city for singles, allowing people who move for their career to also find happiness outside of work.
Orlando, FL
Orlando, FL, is the second-best city for starting a career, boasting one of the highest levels of entrepreneurial activity among large cities, helping drive job creation and career opportunities. In addition, it has the highest number of entry-level job openings per capita, along with lots of openings at companies rated 4 or 5 stars.
Orlando also attracts a growing number of young professionals, ranking fifth in the country for the percentage of millennials moving to the city, creating a dynamic environment for building a career. In addition, people in Orlando have higher job satisfaction than people in most other cities.
To top things off, Orlando ranks second among the most fun cities in America, so there’s plenty to do when off the clock.
Austin, TX
Austin is the third-best city to start a career, thanks to the highest monthly average starting salaries, giving new professionals a strong financial head start. It also has the 15th-highest number of entry-level jobs per capita.
In addition, Austin’s median annual household income is the 10th-highest in the nation, providing strong earning potential for those starting a career or a business. Austin is also the sixth best city for singles, offering a vibrant social scene alongside strong career opportunities for young professionals.
Ask The Experts
Choosing a career path can be just as challenging as finding a place in which to settle down. To help job seekers with such decisions, we turned to a panel of experts for their thoughts on the following key questions:
- What can city policymakers and corporations do to attract and retain recent graduates?
- Do you have any tips for turning an entry-level job into a long, successful career?
- What is the biggest career mistake that young people make?
- In choosing a city to start a career, what are the top 5 indicators?
- Is starting a career in 2026 likely to be more challenging than in previous years? Why?
Ask the Experts
Master Lecturer, Director of Case Competitions, Boston University Questrom School of Business
Read More
Adjunct Professor at CUNY Baruch College and founder of The Orchard Method
Read More
Ph.D., Instructor, Department of Marketing - Southeast Missouri State University
Read More
Ph.D. – Associate Professor, College of Business and Management - Lynn University
Read More
Ed.D. - Associate Dean of Career Development and Field Work Term - Bennington College
Read More
Ph.D., Associate Professor, Co-Program Director, Counselor Education, Department of Counselor Education & School Psychology, School of Education - Duquesne University
Read More
Methodology
In order to determine the best cities in which to launch a career, WalletHub compared 182 cities — including the 150 most populated U.S. cities, plus at least two of the most populated cities in each state — across two key dimensions, “Professional Opportunities” and “Quality of Life.” Our sample considers only city proper in each case and excludes cities in the surrounding metro area.
We evaluated the two dimensions using 25 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for job-market entrants.
We then determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order our sample.
Professional Opportunities – Total Points: 70
- Availability of Entry-Level Jobs: Double Weight (~10.37 Points)
Note: This metric measures the number of entry-level jobs per 100,000 residents aged 16 and older. - 4+ Star Company Jobs per Total People in Labor Force: Full Weight (~5.19 Points)
Note: This metric measures the number of full time job opportunities at companies with 4+ stars on Glassdoor.com per the total number of people in the labor force. - Monthly Average Starting Salary: Full Weight (~5.19 Points)
Note: This metric was adjusted for the cost of living. - Annual Job Growth Rate: Full Weight (~5.19 Points)
Note: This metric was adjusted for population growth. - Median-Income Growth Rate: Full Weight (~5.19 Points)
- Share of Workers in Poverty: Full Weight (~5.19 Points)
- Workforce Diversity: Full Weight (~5.19 Points)
- Unemployment Rate: Full Weight (~5.19 Points)
- Underemployment Rate: Full Weight (~5.19 Points)
- Job Satisfaction: Full Weight (~5.19 Points)
Note: This metric is based on The Indeed Job Happiness Index 2016. - Career Counselors per 1,000 Workers: Half Weight (~2.59 Points)
- Entrepreneur-Friendliness: Full Weight (~5.19 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best Large Cities to Start a Business” ranking. - MSA GDP Growth Rate: Full Weight (~5.19 Points)
Quality of Life – Total Points: 30
- Median Annual Income: Full Weight (~2.73 Points)
Note: This metric was adjusted for the cost of living. - Average Length of Work Week (in Hours): Half Weight (~1.36 Points)
- Commuter-Friendly Jobs: Full Weight (~2.73 Points)
Note: This metric measures the number of jobs accessible by a 30-minute transit ride per total civilian employed population. - Average Commute Time (in Minutes): Half Weight (~1.36 Points)
- Share of Population Aged 25 to 34: Full Weight (~2.73 Points)
- Share of Millennial Newcomers: Full Weight (~2.73 Points)
- Share of Adults Aged 25 & Older with at Least a Bachelor’s Degree: Full Weight (~2.73 Points)
- Projected Population Growth (2046 vs. 2016): Full Weight (~2.73 Points)
- Housing Affordability: Full Weight (~2.73 Points)
- Fun-Friendliness: Full Weight (~2.73 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Most Fun Cities in America” ranking. - Family-Friendliness: Full Weight (~2.73 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Cities for Families” ranking. - Singles-Friendliness: Full Weight (~2.73 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Cities for Singles” ranking.
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected as of April 13, 2026 from the U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Indeed.com, Glassdoor, Council for Community & Economic Research, United States Conference of Mayors, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Chmura Economics & Analytics, Center for Neighborhood Technology and WalletHub research.













WalletHub's personal finance experts are frequently cited by leading media outlets. Contact our media team to arrange an interview.