While the U.S. is one of the most educated countries in the world, it doesn’t provide the same quality elementary school or secondary school education to all students. In many states, more affluent school districts receive a greater amount of funding per student than poorer districts, with one estimate claiming that low-income districts are underfunded by around $6,700 per pupil.
Discrepancies between the rich and poor have been exacerbated even more due to the lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Low-income students have suffered the greatest “learning loss” due to partial or total remote learning. One contributing factor is that people in low-income districts are less likely to have the technological resources they need.
States that provide equitable funding to all school districts can help prevent poor students from having lower graduation rates, lower rates of pursuing higher education and smaller future incomes than their wealthy peers. The difference is dramatic: College graduates have $154 - $1,115 higher median weekly earnings than people with a high school diploma and no college experience, depending on the degree.
Nebraska has the 11th most equitable school districts in the U.S. overall, but some districts within the state are fairer than others. To find out where school funding is distributed most equitably, WalletHub scored 244 districts in Nebraska based on two metrics: average household income and expenditures for public elementary and secondary schools per pupil.
Main Findings
Note: For visual purposes, we included only the top 7 school districts by enrollment from each category. Rank 1 on the “Expenditures Ranking” means highest expenditures and Rank 1 on “Income Ranking” means lowest income.
Most & Least Equitable School Districts in Nebraska
| Rank* | School District | Score | Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Schools per Pupil | Income by School District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sterling Public Schools | 0.04 | $16,149 | $60,000 |
| 2 | Elm Creek Public Schools | 0.07 | $14,025 | $68,025 |
| 3 | O'Neill Public Schools | 0.35 | $15,037 | $64,403 |
| 4 | Crawford Public Schools | 0.65 | $17,769 | $53,566 |
| 5 | Wisner-Pilger Public Schools | 0.99 | $16,664 | $57,500 |
| 6 | Riverside Public Schools | 1.04 | $19,827 | $46,875 |
| 7 | Perkins County Schools | 1.12 | $15,568 | $61,528 |
| 8 | Heartland Community Schools | 1.2 | $14,445 | $65,688 |
| 9 | Howells-Dodge Consolidated Schools | 1.24 | $15,220 | $62,763 |
| 10 | Tri County Public Schools | 1.33 | $15,769 | $60,648 |
| 11 | Dorchester Public School | 1.45 | $14,536 | $66,944 |
| 12 | Ansley Public Schools | 1.54 | $17,563 | $55,658 |
| 13 | Douglas Co West Community Schs | 1.72 | $12,387 | $75,161 |
| 14 | Leigh Community Schools | 1.83 | $14,199 | $68,438 |
| 15 | Kenesaw Public Schools | 1.99 | $15,856 | $62,321 |
| 16 | Boone Central Schools | 2 | $15,096 | $62,768 |
| 17 | Hay Springs Public Schools | 2.18 | $15,813 | $62,600 |
| 18 | Wausa Public Schools | 2.23 | $14,272 | $65,714 |
| 19 | Blue Hill Community Schools | 2.42 | $16,459 | $57,404 |
| 20 | Bellevue Public Schools | 2.57 | $11,686 | $75,198 |
| 21 | Axtell Community Schools | 2.73 | $14,716 | $67,042 |
| 22 | Laurel-Concord-Coleridge School | 3.04 | $17,187 | $57,969 |
| 23 | Cambridge Public Schools | 3.09 | $14,892 | $62,875 |
| 24 | Humphrey Public Schools | 3.11 | $14,960 | $66,354 |
| 25 | Loomis Public Schools | 3.15 | $14,716 | $63,500 |
| 26 | Stuart Public Schools | 3.49 | $16,484 | $56,667 |
| 27 | Wood River Rural Schools | 3.67 | $16,777 | $59,886 |
| 28 | Palmyra District O R 1 | 3.7 | $11,527 | $79,574 |
| 29 | Valentine Community Schools | 3.77 | $17,406 | $53,047 |
| 30 | Mullen Public Schools | 3.91 | $20,344 | $46,667 |
*1=Most Equitable
Methodology
In order to rank the states with the most and least equitable school districts, WalletHub first scored 12,876 school districts throughout the U.S. based on two metrics: average household income and expenditures for public elementary and secondary schools per pupil.
For expenditures, for each 1 percent above the state's average we removed 1 point from a base score of 50 points for each district. For household income, for each 1 percent above the state's average we added 1 point to a base score of 50 points for each district. The inverse was true for each 1 percent below the state's average.
The final score for each district was calculated by taking the absolute difference between the score for expenditures and the score for household income. We then ranked the districts based on the total score, with the lowest value, representing the most equitable, being ranked 1.
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from of the U.S. Census Bureau and the National Center for Education Statistics.